Why Reductionism does not Work

In Oliver Passon & Christoph Benzmüller (eds.), Wider den Reduktionismus -- Ausgewählte Beiträge zum Kurt Gödel Preis 2019. Springer Nature Switzerland. pp. 51-92 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Kurt Gödel opposed the reductionist viewpoint of logical positivism. The arguments I give below show he is correct. The reductionist explanation he opposed is doomed to failure.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,853

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Can a reductionist be a pluralist?Daniel Steel - 2004 - Biology and Philosophy 19 (1):55-73.
Spirituality and reductionism: Three replies.John Paley - 2010 - Nursing Philosophy 11 (3):178-190.
Non-reductionism and special concern.Jens Johansson - 2007 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85 (4):641 – 657.
A compromise between reductionism and non-reductionism.Eray Özkural - 2007 - In Carlos Gershenson, Diederik Aerts & Bruce Edmonds (eds.), Worldviews, Science, and Us: Philosophy and Complexity. World Scientific. pp. 285.
Reductionism.Alyssa Ney - 2008 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-03-09

Downloads
29 (#550,776)

6 months
10 (#268,574)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

George Ellis
Cambridge University (PhD)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references