- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Comparing apples to oranges; Is it better to be human than otherwise?
Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 10 (1):19-27 (2021)
Abstract
Thought: A Journal of Philosophy, EarlyView.Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Comparing Apples and Oranges: Some Dangers in Confusing Frameworks with Theories.Vimla L. Patel & Guy J. Groen - 1993 - Cognitive Science 17 (1):135-141.
Comparing apples to oranges: Who does the framing?Richard Griffin & Daniel Dennett - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (5):656-656.
The metaphysics of multiple realizability: It's like apples and oranges.Lawrence A. Shapiro - manuscript
Apples and oranges: A rejoinder to Smith and Siegel.Bill Cobern - 2004 - Science & Education 13 (6):583-589.
Apples and oranges: The pitfalls of comparative intelligence.Anne Savage & Charles T. Snowdon - 1989 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12 (3):605-606.
Tool use, imitation, and insight: Apples, oranges, and conceptual pea soup.Dorothy M. Fragaszy - 1989 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12 (3):596-598.
Appels, peren en fruit.Annemarie van Stee - 2019 - Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte 111 (3):433-452.
Social-cognitive factors in expectancy effects: why apples and oranges are fruits.Guldo Peeters - 1980 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (3):471-471.
Parcellation: An explanation of the arrangement of apples and oranges on a severely pruned phylogenetic tree?Mark R. Braford - 1984 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7 (3):332-333.
Risks versus Benefits is like Apples versus Oranges.David Hunter - 2011 - Research Ethics 7 (3):79-80.
Apples, Oranges, and the Role of Gassendi’s Atomism in Seventeenth-Century Science.Daniel Garber - 1995 - Perspectives on Science 3 (4):425-428.
Apples and Oranges Revisited: Contextualized Comparisons and the Study of Comparative Labor Politics.Kathleen Thelen & Richard M. Locke - 1995 - Politics and Society 23 (3):337-367.
Comparative Ethics and the Ethics of Comparison.William A. Barbieri - 2001 - International Philosophical Quarterly 41 (3):285-303.
Analytics
Added to PP
2020-12-31
Downloads
33 (#484,570)
6 months
4 (#790,314)
2020-12-31
Downloads
33 (#484,570)
6 months
4 (#790,314)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Is it Good Enough to be Good Qua Human? The Normative Independence of Attributive Goodness.Casey S. Elliott - forthcoming - Erkenntnis:1-24.
References found in this work
Life and action: elementary structures of practice and practical thought.Michael Thompson - 2008 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Have Elephant Seals Refuted Aristotle? Nature, Function, and Moral Goodness.Micah Lott - 2012 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 9 (3):353-375.
How to Be an Ethical Naturalist.Jennifer A. Frey - 2018 - In Micah Lott (ed.), Philippa Foot on Goodness and Virtue. Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 47-84.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-64dd777598-vk9kt uwo