- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Apples and oranges: The pitfalls of comparative intelligence
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12 (3):605-606 (1989)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
Social-cognitive factors in expectancy effects: why apples and oranges are fruits.Guldo Peeters - 1980 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (3):471-471.
Parcellation: An explanation of the arrangement of apples and oranges on a severely pruned phylogenetic tree?Mark R. Braford - 1984 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7 (3):332-333.
Tool use, imitation, and insight: Apples, oranges, and conceptual pea soup.Dorothy M. Fragaszy - 1989 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12 (3):596-598.
Comparing apples to oranges: Who does the framing?Richard Griffin & Daniel Dennett - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (5):656-656.
Panselectionist pitfalls in Parker & Gibson's model for the evolution of intelligence.Stephen Jay Gould - 1979 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2 (3):385-386.
Apples and Oranges Revisited: Contextualized Comparisons and the Study of Comparative Labor Politics.Kathleen Thelen & Richard M. Locke - 1995 - Politics and Society 23 (3):337-367.
Cognitive science and comparative intelligence.Ira Fischler - 1987 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 10 (4):665.
Causal links, contingencies, and the comparative psychology of intelligence.Juan C. Gómez - 1990 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13 (2):392-392.
Direction-of-comparison effects : how and why comparing apples with oranges is different from comparing oranges with apples.Michaela Wänke & Leonie Reutner - 2011 - In Gideon Keren (ed.), Perspectives on framing. New York: Psychology Press.
Comparative studies of animal intelligence: Is Spearman's g really Hull's D?Euan M. Macphail - 1985 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8 (2):234-235.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-01-20
Downloads
23 (#671,645)
6 months
7 (#591,670)
2014-01-20
Downloads
23 (#671,645)
6 months
7 (#591,670)
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
The nature of selection: evolutionary theory in philosophical focus.Elliott Sober - 1984 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-kkm7k uwo