Moral reasoning and the review of research involving human subjects

Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 11 (1):37-69 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

: The model of moral reasoning used in Institutional Review Board review fails to uphold ethical ideals for research participants for it does not adequately acknowledge the particular context of research or of subjects, including their gender, their socioeconomic status, and the communities in which they lead their lives. The ethical review of research needs to take seriously the particularities of the research context as well as the situations of potential participants. A variety of conclusions are drawn for changes to the system for ethical review. Most significant is a call for effective consultation with the various communities affected by research and greater reliance on subject representatives. Also proposed is national review for selected research.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 89,703

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A decent proposal: ethical review of clinical research.Donald Evans - 1996 - New York, N.Y.: Wiley. Edited by Martyn Evans.
The ethics and politics of human experimentation.Paul Murray McNeill - 1993 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Piercing the veil: Ethical issues in ethnographic research.Brian Schrag - 2008 - Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (2):135-160.
Research ethics.Ana Smith Iltis (ed.) - 2006 - London: Routledge.
New Rules for Research with Human Participants?Jessica Berg & Nicole Deming - 2011 - Hastings Center Report 41 (6):10-11.
Responsible conduct of research.Adil E. Shamoo - 2009 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by David B. Resnik.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
47 (#295,310)

6 months
3 (#435,246)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?