Authors
Michael Dillon
Lancaster University
Abstract
This article first locates Jacques Rancière’s account of politics in the context of French thinking in the second half of the 20th century. It then summarizes how Rancière defines politics in terms of an originary equality that supports all orders of command and obedience. For Rancière, also, the world as a ‘whole’ does not add up. It is characterized by ‘paradoxical magnitude’. Paradoxical magnitude means that every regime of politics will nonetheless also be a miscount, a ‘wrong’ that will in particular fail to satisfy the originary equality that is supposed by all ‘partitions of the sensible’. Since there is no metric by reference to which the ‘whole’ of the world can be made to add up, politics cannot be an epistemological question. For Rancière it is a matter of the polemical practices by which equality is verified through emancipation. The complex ‘taking place’ of emancipation is the theme of teaching what we do not know that preoccupies Rancière’s The Ignorant Schoolmaster. Here, the article argues, emancipation also finds a distinctly messianic expression. The aporetic difficulty of teaching what we do not know as an emancipatory practice is explored by reading The Ignorant Schoolmaster with and against Stanley Rosen’s reading of Plato’s Statesman, which poses the same problem but resolves it differently. The article concludes by asking what is at stake in this messianic expression of emancipation.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/1474885105055991
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,714
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

A Politics of Passion in Education: The Foucauldian Legacy.Michalinos Zembylas - 2007 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 39 (2):135–149.
A Politics of Passion in Education: The Foucauldian Legacy.Michalinos Zembylas - 2007 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 39 (2):135-149.
Reason, Passion and the Will.İlham Dilman - 1984 - Philosophy 59 (228):185 - 204.
Passion and Politics.Walzer Michael - 2002 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 28 (6):617-633.
Moral Passion and Christian Ethics.Robin Gill - 2017 - Cambridge University Press.
Passion of the relationship - Passion of the lack.Hadwig Muller - 2000 - Revue des Sciences Religieuses 74 (2):194-210.
Passion de la Relation — Passion du Manque.Hadwig Muller - 2000 - Revue des Sciences Religieuses 74 (2):194-210.
Descartes on the Identity of Passion and Action.Joel A. Schickel - 2011 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (6):1067 - 1084.
Descartes on Passion Reformation.Basileios Kroustallis - 2005 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 87 (3):312-323.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-12-28

Total views
5 ( #1,183,617 of 2,462,777 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #299,182 of 2,462,777 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes