Is Analytic Marxism Possible? A ‘Socialist’ Interpretation of Public Choice Theory

Philosophy of Management 5 (2):89-95 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Much management literature depends on the philosophical writings of F A Hayek and James M Buchanan. As such it is recognisably not Marxist but is in fact antithetical to Marxism. But there is a small, significant body of literature which attempts to recruit the ideas of writers in the field of ‘Public Choice’ (pre-eminently Buchanan) to the service of updated Marxist thinking about management. In this paper I argue that this endeavour, although it illustrates the common origins of neoliberalism and Marxism, cannot succeed without doing violence to the original and perhaps fundamental concepts of Marxist thought.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,709

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Alasdair MacIntyre as a Marxist and as a Critic of Marxism.Paul Blackledge - 2014 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 88 (4):705-724.
The Marxism of George Bernard Shaw 1883-1889.Mark Bevir - 1992 - History of Political Thought 13 (2):299-318.
Review essay: A future for (analytical) marxism?Roberto Veneziani - 2008 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 38 (3):388-399.
Leon Trotsky’s Contribution to the Marxist Theory of History.Paul Blackledge - 2006 - Studies in East European Thought 58 (1):1 - 31.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-06-12

Downloads
51 (#310,975)

6 months
12 (#210,071)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Nesta Devine
Auckland Institute of Technology

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references