Reply to Nelson

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 16 (4):478 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We are gratified by Nelson's response to our commentary. It shows, for the first time, an appreciation of the distinctive character of our criticism of individual decisions to test and terminate for fetal impairment. Although we still find much to disagree with in Nelson's characterization and critique of our views, he has given us a welcome opportunity to clarify and develop them

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,601

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reply to Nelson Goodman.Rudolf Carnap - 1947 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 8 (3):461-462.
Review: Rudolf Carnap, Reply to Nelson Goodman. [REVIEW]C. West Churchman - 1948 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 13 (2):121-121.
The (in)visibility of others: a reply to Herschbach.Shaun Gallagher & Dan Zahavi - 2008 - Philosophical Explorations 11 (3):237-244.
Phenomenology and Psychopathology.Josef Parnas, Louis Sass & Dan Zahavi - 2011 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 18 (1):37-39.
A Reply to Spital's Concerns.Mary Simmerling & Joel Frader - 2008 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 17 (1):128-130.
Nelson’s logic ????Thiago Nascimento, Umberto Rivieccio, João Marcos & Matthew Spinks - 2020 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 28 (6):1182-1206.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
52 (#446,975)

6 months
10 (#326,027)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references