Autonomous consumption: Buying into the ideology of capitalism [Book Review]

Journal of Business Ethics 48 (3):229 - 236 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to examine three different approaches to autonomy in order to demonstrate how each leads to a different conclusion about the ethicality of advertising. I contend that Noggle''s (1995) belief-based autonomy theory provides the most complete understanding of autonomy. Read in conjunction with Arendt''s theory of cooperative power, Noggle''s theory leads to the conclusion that advertising does not violate consumers'' autonomy. Although it is possible for advertisers to abuse the power granted them by society these abuses do not constitute a violation of consumers'' autonomy.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

In defense of advertising: A social perspective. [REVIEW]Barbara J. Phillips - 1997 - Journal of Business Ethics 16 (2):109-118.
Persuasive advertising, autonomy, and the creation of desire.Roger Crisp - 1987 - Journal of Business Ethics 6 (5):413 - 418.
Consumer Autonomy and Availability of Genetically Modified Food.Helena Siipi & Susanne Uusitalo - 2011 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 24 (2):147-163.
Advertising and deep autonomy.Andrew Sneddon - 2001 - Journal of Business Ethics 33 (1):15 - 28.
Advertising and behavior control.Robert L. Arrington - 1982 - Journal of Business Ethics 1 (1):3 - 12.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
56 (#281,081)

6 months
9 (#294,961)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references