Dobbs, the Intrusive State, and the Future of Solidarity

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 32 (3):344-356 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The intrusive state has long viewed women as fetal containers. The Dobbs decision goes further, essentially causing women to vanish when fetuses are abstracted from their relationships to pregnant persons. The ways in which women are first controlled and then made invisible are clearly connected with the move from obedience to omission that has historically affected black Americans. When personal decisionmaking and participation in democracy are regarded as threats, those threatened restrict decisional freedom and political power, deepening structural injustices relating to sex, race, and poverty. Fear of Dobbs has health effects on conditions unrelated to pregnancy and connects with erasures of human value that are not health-related. We reaffirm solidarity as a countering influence. Taking account of the richly relational context in which issues like abortion and political representation arise should lead to better, more meaningful policies, making so many people impossible to unsee.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,296

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Protecting Health after Dobbs.Brietta R. Clark - 2022 - Hastings Center Report 52 (6):6-7.
The Impact of Dobbs on Health Care Beyond Wanted Abortion Care.Maya Manian - 2023 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 51 (3):592-600.
Anti-Abortion Exceptionalism after Dobbs.Elizabeth Sepper - 2023 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 51 (3):612-617.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-03-18

Downloads
13 (#1,066,279)

6 months
8 (#415,230)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations