Science, ethics, and free will: why neuroscience doesn't ground freedom, and what we might resolve to do about it

In Philip Clayton, James W. Walters & John Martin Fischer (eds.), What's with free will?: ethics and religion after neuroscience. Eugene, Oregon: Cascade Books, an imprint of Wipf and Stock Publishers (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,475

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Free will as a problem in neurobiology.John R. Searle - 2001 - Philosophy 76 (298):491-514.
What If? The Farther Shores of Neuroethics: Commentary on “Neuroscience May Supersede Ethics and Law”.Henry T. Greely - 2012 - Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (3):439-446.
Speech, Media and Ethics—The Limits of Free Expression: Critical Studies on Freedom of Expression, Freedom of the Press and the Public's Right to Know.Raphael Cohen-Almagor & Itzhak Yanovitzky - 2001 - Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (3):447.
Responsible conduct in research.Prof Dr P. J. D. Drenth - 2006 - Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (1):13-21.
Voles, vasopressin, and infidelity: a molecular basis for monogamy, a platform for ethics, and more?Daniel J. McKaughan - 2012 - Biology and Philosophy 27 (4):521-543.
The contradictions of free market doctrine: Is there a solution? [REVIEW]John McMurtry - 1997 - Journal of Business Ethics 16 (7):645-662.
That of freedom": everywhere and all the way down.David R. Larson - 2020 - In Philip Clayton, James W. Walters & John Martin Fischer (eds.), What's with free will?: ethics and religion after neuroscience. Eugene, Oregon: Cascade Books, an imprint of Wipf and Stock Publishers.
Modern science and human freedom.David L. Miller - 1959 - New York,: Greenwood Press.
Freedom for neighbor love.Gerald R. Winslow - 2020 - In Philip Clayton, James W. Walters & John Martin Fischer (eds.), What's with free will?: ethics and religion after neuroscience. Eugene, Oregon: Cascade Books, an imprint of Wipf and Stock Publishers.
Free Will Doesn't Come For Free.Neil Levy - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 4 (4):53-54.
Can Neuroscience Contribute to Practical Ethics? A Critical Review and Discussion of the Methodological and Translational Challenges of the Neuroscience of Ethics.Eric Racine, Veljko Dubljević, Ralf J. Jox, Bernard Baertschi, Julia F. Christensen, Michele Farisco, Fabrice Jotterand, Guy Kahane & Sabine Müller - 2017 - Bioethics 31 (5):328-337.
Free-will and possibilities.William H. Hay - 1957 - Philosophy of Science 24 (July):207-214.
The scope and limits of value-freedom in science.Panu Raatikainen - 2006 - In Heikki J. Koskinen Sami Pihlstrom & Risto Vilkko (eds.), Science – A Challenge to Philosophy?
Neuroscience, Ethics and Legal Responsibility: The Problem of the Insanity Defense: Commentary on “The Ethics of Neuroscience and the Neuroscience of Ethics: A Phenomenological–Existential Approach”.Steven R. Smith - 2012 - Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (3):475-481.
Genuine (but limited) freedom for creatures and for a god of love.Thomas Jay Oord - 2020 - In Philip Clayton, James W. Walters & John Martin Fischer (eds.), What's with free will?: ethics and religion after neuroscience. Eugene, Oregon: Cascade Books, an imprint of Wipf and Stock Publishers.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-12-02

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references