Neuroscience, Ethics and Legal Responsibility: The Problem of the Insanity Defense: Commentary on “The Ethics of Neuroscience and the Neuroscience of Ethics: A Phenomenological–Existential Approach”

Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (3):475-481 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The insanity defense presents many difficult questions for the legal system. It attracts attention beyond its practical significance (it is seldom used successfully) because it goes to the heart of the concept of legal responsibility. “Not guilty by reason of insanity” generally requires that as a result of mental illness the defendant was unable to distinguish right from wrong at the time of the crime. The many difficult and complex questions presented by the insanity defense have led some in the legal community to hope that neuroscience might help resolve some of these problems, but that hope is not likely to be realized



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 86,403

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Insanity and responsibility.Herbert Fingarette - 1972 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 15 (1-4):6 – 29.
The mad, the bad, and the psychopath.Heidi L. Maibom - 2008 - Neuroethics 1 (3):167-184.
The insanity plea: Szaszian ethics and epistemology.Lee S. Weinberg & Richard E. Vatz - 1982 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 3 (3):417-433.
Failed Agency and the Insanity Defence.Steve Matthews - 2004 - International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 27:413-424.
The moral foundations of the insanity defense.Thomas R. Litwack - 1984 - Criminal Justice Ethics 3 (1):12-19.
Commentary: Insanity defense reform.Orrin G. Hatch - 1984 - Criminal Justice Ethics 3 (2):2-88.
The insanity defense.Ernest Van Den Haag - 1984 - Criminal Justice Ethics 3 (1):3-11.
Duress and criminal responsibility.Craig L. Carr - 1991 - Law and Philosophy 10 (2):161-188.
Responsibility.Garrath Williams - 2006 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Legal Responsibility and Neuroscience.Nicole A. Vincent (ed.) - 2013 - Oxford University Press.


Added to PP

83 (#173,878)

6 months
1 (#867,495)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?