Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (5):2867-2891 (2020)
Authors | |
Abstract |
The use of drones in public healthcare is suggested as a means to improve efficiency under constrained resources and personnel. This paper begins by framing drones in healthcare as a social experiment where ethical guidelines are needed to protect those impacted while fully realizing the benefits the technology offers. Then we propose an ethical framework to facilitate the design, development, implementation, and assessment of drones used in public healthcare. Given the healthcare context, we structure the framework according to the four bioethics principles: beneficence, non-maleficence, autonomy, and justice, plus a fifth principle from artificial intelligence ethics: explicability. These principles are abstract which makes operationalization a challenge; therefore, we suggest an approach of translation according to a values hierarchy whereby the top-level ethical principles are translated into relevant human values within the domain. The resulting framework is an applied ethics tool that facilitates awareness of relevant ethical issues during the design, development, implementation, and assessment of drones in public healthcare.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | |
DOI | 10.1007/s11948-020-00233-1 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
A United Framework of Five Principles for AI in Society.Luciano Floridi & Josh Cowls - 2019 - Harvard Data Science Review 1 (1).
AI4People—an Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society: Opportunities, Risks, Principles, and Recommendations.Luciano Floridi, Josh Cowls, Monica Beltrametti, Raja Chatila, Patrice Chazerand, Virginia Dignum, Christoph Luetge, Robert Madelin, Ugo Pagallo, Francesca Rossi, Burkhard Schafer, Peggy Valcke & Effy Vayena - 2018 - Minds and Machines 28 (4):689-707.
Granny and the Robots: Ethical Issues in Robot Care for the Elderly.Amanda Sharkey & Noel Sharkey - 2012 - Ethics and Information Technology 14 (1):27-40.
View all 23 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Implementing Ethics in Healthcare AI-Based Applications: A Scoping Review.Robyn Clay-Williams, Elizabeth Austin & Magali Goirand - 2021 - Science and Engineering Ethics 27 (5):1-53.
Responsible Governance of Civilian Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Innovations for Indian Crop Insurance Applications.Anjan Chamuah & Rajbeer Singh - 2022 - Journal of Responsible Technology 9:100025.
Similar books and articles
Designing Robots for Care: Care Centered Value-Sensitive Design. [REVIEW]Aimee Wynsberghe - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (2):407-433.
Designing Robots for Care: Care Centered Value-Sensitive Design.Aimee van Wynsberghe - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (2):407-433.
‘You Wouldn’T Have Your Granny Using Them’: Drawing Boundaries Between Acceptable and Unacceptable Applications of Civil Drones.Philip Boucher - 2016 - Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (5):1391-1418.
Ethical Analysis of Public Health Programmes: What Does It Entail?Giridhara R. Babu & A. Yamuna - 2018 - In Arima Mishra & Kalyani Subbiah (eds.), Ethics in Public Health Practice in India. Springer Singapore. pp. 63-83.
Responsible AI: Two Frameworks for Ethical Design and Practice.Dorian Peters, Karina Vold, Diana Robinson & Rafael Calvo - 2020 - IEEE Transactions on Technology and Society 1 (1).
Public Health Ethics and Rights in Healthcare Programmes.Joseph Mfutso-Bengo, Elizabeth Bukusi & Eva Mfutso-Bengo - 2018 - In Nico Nortjé, Jo-Celene De Jongh & Willem A. Hoffmann (eds.), African Perspectives on Ethics for Healthcare Professionals. Springer Verlag. pp. 215-234.
A Framework for the Ethical Impact Assessment of Information Technology.David Wright - 2011 - Ethics and Information Technology 13 (3):199-226.
Reliability and the Design of Ethical Organizations: A Rational Systems Approach. [REVIEW]Bryan W. Husted - 1993 - Journal of Business Ethics 12 (10):761 - 769.
The Design of GDPR-Abiding Drones Through Flight Operation Maps: A Win–Win Approach to Data Protection, Aerospace Engineering, and Risk Management.Eleonora Bassi, Nicoletta Bloise, Jacopo Dirutigliano, Gian Piero Fici, Ugo Pagallo, Stefano Primatesta & Fulvia Quagliotti - 2019 - Minds and Machines 29 (4):579-601.
The Design of GDPR-Abiding Drones Through Flight Operation Maps: A Win–Win Approach to Data Protection, Aerospace Engineering, and Risk Management.Eleonora Bassi, Nicoletta Bloise, Jacopo Dirutigliano, Gian Piero Fici, Ugo Pagallo, Stefano Primatesta & Fulvia Quagliotti - 2019 - Minds and Machines 29 (4):579-601.
The Design of GDPR-Abiding Drones Through Flight Operation Maps: A Win–Win Approach to Data Protection, Aerospace Engineering, and Risk Management.Eleonora Bassi, Nicoletta Bloise, Jacopo Dirutigliano, Gian Piero Fici, Ugo Pagallo, Stefano Primatesta & Fulvia Quagliotti - 2019 - Minds and Machines 29 (4):579-601.
In the Shadow of Drones – Ethical Aspects of the Use of Drones in War on Terror.Ivica Kelam - 2016 - Filozofska Istrazivanja 36 (4):679-691.
Risk, Overdiagnosis and Ethical Justifications.Wendy A. Rogers, Vikki A. Entwistle & Stacy M. Carter - 2019 - Health Care Analysis 27 (4):231-248.
Professional Ethics of Software Engineers: An Ethical Framework.Yotam Lurie & Shlomo Mark - 2016 - Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (2):417-434.
A Rhetorical Narrative Framework for Ethical Decision-Making in the Public.Kirstin Anne Kiledal - 1995 - Dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University
Analytics
Added to PP index
2020-06-24
Total views
13 ( #766,337 of 2,499,748 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #418,066 of 2,499,748 )
2020-06-24
Total views
13 ( #766,337 of 2,499,748 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #418,066 of 2,499,748 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads