Weak reciprocity alone cannot explain peer punishment

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (1):21-22 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The claims about (1) the lack of empirical support for a model of strong reciprocation and (2) the irrelevant empirical role of costly punishment to support cooperation in the field need qualifications. The interpretation of field evidence is not straightforward, and other-regarding preferences are also likely to play a role in the field

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,897

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Serial Reciprocity: A Preliminary Statement.Michael Moody - 2008 - Sociological Theory 26 (2):130-151.
Unintentional Punishment.Adam J. Kolber - 2012 - Legal Theory 18 (1):1-29.
Retributivism and Fallible Systems of Punishment.George Schedler - 2011 - Criminal Justice Ethics 30 (3):240-266.
The principles and practices of Peer review.Ronald N. Kostoff - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (1):19-34.
Perspectives from ethnography on weak and strong reciprocity.Polly Wiessner - 2012 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (1):44-45.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-27

Downloads
22 (#709,216)

6 months
1 (#1,471,540)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references