Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (1):19-34 (1997)

Abstract
The principles and practices of research peer review are described. While the principles are fundamentally generic and apply to peer review across the full spectrum of performing institutions as well as to manuscript/proposal/program peer review, the focus of this paper is peer review of proposed and ongoing programs in federal agencies. The paper describes desireable characteristics and important intangible factors in successful peer review. Also presented is a heuristic protocol for the conduct of successful peer review research evaluations and impact assessments. Problems with peer review are then outlined, followed by examples of peer review of proposed and existing programs in selected federal agencies. Some peer review variants, such as the Science Court, are described, and then research requirements to improve peer review are discussed.
Keywords peer review  research evaluation  research impact assessment  science court
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11948-997-0014-6
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,436
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Predictive Validity of Peer Review: A Neglected Issue.Robert F. Bornstein - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):138-139.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Peer Review and Innovation.Raymond Spier - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (1):99-108.
Conflicts of Interest in Science.David B. Resnik - 1998 - Perspectives on Science 6 (4):381-408.
Using a Dialectical Scientific Brief in Peer Review.Arthur E. Stamps - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (1):85-98.
Using a Dialectical Scientific Brief in Peer Review.Arthur Stamps Iii - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (1):85-98.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
67 ( #173,091 of 2,520,411 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #405,718 of 2,520,411 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes