Strong reciprocity is real, but there is no evidence that uncoordinated costly punishment sustains cooperation in the wild

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (1):45-59 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I argue in my target article that field evidence does not support the costly punishment hypothesis. Some commentators object to my reading of the evidence, while others agree that evidence in favour of costly punishment is scant. Most importantly, no rigorous measurement of cost-benefit ratios in the field has been attempted so far. This lack of evidence does not rule out costly punishment as a cause of human cooperation, but it does pre-empt some overconfident claims made in the past. Other commentators have interpreted my article as an anti-experimental pamphlet or as a flat denial of the existence of pro-social motives – which it was not intended to be. While we have enough data to establish the existence (and theoretical relevance) of strong reciprocity motives, I argue in this response that their efficacy (and policy relevance) has not been demonstrated

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Strong reciprocity and the emergence of large-scale societies.Benoît Dubreuil - 2008 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 38 (2):192-210.
Costly signalling theories: beyond the handicap principle.Ben Fraser - 2012 - Biology and Philosophy 27 (2):263-278.
Strong reciprocity is not uncommon in the “wild”.W. G. Runciman - 2012 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (1):38-39.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-27

Downloads
43 (#324,761)

6 months
3 (#445,838)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Francesco Guala
Università degli Studi di Milano