If You’re an Egalitarian, You Shouldn’t be so Rich

The Journal of Ethics 25 (3):323-337 (2020)


G.A. Cohen famously claims that egalitarians shouldn’t be so rich. If you possess excess income and there is little chance that the state will redistribute it to the poor, you are obligated to donate it yourself. We argue that this conclusion is correct, but that the case against the rich egalitarian is significantly stronger than the one Cohen offers. In particular, the standard arguments against donating one’s excess income face two critical, unrecognized problems. First, we show that these arguments imply that citizens have no duty to further egalitarian political institutions—a conclusion that Cohen’s Rawlsian opponents cannot abide. Second, these arguments yield unacceptable implications for other questions of justice. We conclude that even moderately rich egalitarians are obligated to donate their excess income.

Download options


    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,891

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library


Added to PP

57 (#203,632)

6 months
12 (#63,730)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Jason Brennan
Georgetown University
Christopher Freiman
College of William and Mary

References found in this work

Political Liberalism.John Rawls - 1993 - Columbia University Press.
Justice as Fairness: A Restatement.John Rawls (ed.) - 2001 - Harvard University Press.
Rescuing Justice and Equality.G. A. Cohen (ed.) - 2008 - Harvard University Press.
Two Concepts of Rules.John Rawls - 1955 - Philosophical Review 64 (1):3-32.

View all 19 references / Add more references

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

If You're an Egalitarian, How Come You're so Rich.G. A. Cohen - 2000 - The Journal of Ethics 4 (1-2):1-26.
If You're an Egalitarian, How Come You're So Rich?G. A. Cohen - 2001 - Philosophical Quarterly 51 (205):563-565.
Cohen, Nagel and the Rich Egalitarian.Keith Horton - 2002 - Australian Journal of Professional and Applied Ethics 4 (2).
Backing Away From Equality.Steven Wall - 2012 - Criminal Justice Ethics 31 (2):96-105.