- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Of algorithms and Mimesis—GAFA, digital personalization, and freedom as nondomination
Constellations 28 (2):159-175 (2021)
Abstract
Constellations, EarlyView.Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Discretion and domination in criminal procedure: Reflections on Pettit.Vincent Chiao - 2016 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 15 (1):92-110.
What Can Political Freedom Mean in a Multicultural Democracy? On Deliberation, Difference, and Democratic Governance.Clarissa Rile Hayward - 2011 - Political Theory 39 (4):468-497.
The Instability of Freedom as Noninterference: The Case of Isaiah Berlin.Philip Pettit - 2011 - Ethics 121 (4):693-716.
Three Concepts of Political Liberty.Kyle Swan - 2003 - Journal of Markets and Morality 6 (1):117-142.
Bias in algorithmic filtering and personalization.Engin Bozdag - 2013 - Ethics and Information Technology 15 (3):209-227.
Nondomination and normativity.By Christopher Mcmahon - 2007 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 88 (3):319–327.
Heideggerian epistemology and personalized technologies.Theodore Kabouridis - 2015 - Ethics and Information Technology 17 (2):139-151.
A Kantian Republican Conception of Justice as Nondomination.Rainer Forst - 2013 - In Andreas Niederberger & Philipp Schink (eds.), Republican democracy: liberty, law and politics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Another Instrumental Republican Approach?John Maynor - 2002 - European Journal of Political Theory 1 (1):71-89.
Whatever suits you: unpicking personalization for the NHS.Alan Cribb & John Owens - 2010 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 16 (2):310-314.
Introduction: the Governance of Algorithms.Marcello D’Agostino & Massimo Durante - 2018 - Philosophy and Technology 31 (4):499-505.
From industry 4.0 to society 4.0, there and back.Tatiana Mazali - 2018 - AI and Society 33 (3):405-411.
Analytics
Added to PP
2020-04-14
Downloads
17 (#862,403)
6 months
7 (#419,635)
2020-04-14
Downloads
17 (#862,403)
6 months
7 (#419,635)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Democratic self-government and the algocratic shortcut: the democratic harms in algorithmic governance of society.Nardine Alnemr - forthcoming - Contemporary Political Theory:1-23.
References found in this work
The End of Progress: Decolonizing the Normative Foundations of Critical Theory.Amy Allen - 2016 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Deliberative democracy and the epistemic benefits of diversity.James Bohman - 2006 - Episteme 3 (3):175-191.
The Origin and Goal of History.Maurice Mandelbaum & Karl Jaspers - 1954 - Philosophical Review 63 (4):623.
Discourse ethics for computer ethics: a heuristic for engaged dialogical reflection.William Rehg - 2015 - Ethics and Information Technology 17 (1):27-39.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-55b469568f-znn98 uwo