- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Are smokers less deserving of expensive treatment? A randomised controlled trial that goes beyond official values
BMC Medical Ethics 16 (1):28 (2015)
Abstract
To investigate whether Swedish physicians, contrary to Swedish health care policy, employ considerations of patient responsibility for illness when rationing expensive treatmentsLinks
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Is justice a virtue?: Examining the role of justice considerations in micro-level health care rationing.Christina Dineen - 2011 - Ethics 7 (1):1-8.
Rationing of expensive medical care in a transition country—nihil novum?E. Krizova - 2002 - Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (5):308-312.
Evaluating ethics consultation: randomised controlled trial is not the right tool.Y.-Y. Chen & Y.-C. Chen - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (8):594-597.
The challenge of measuring community values in ways appropriate for setting health care priorities.Peter A. Ubel - 1999 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 9 (3):263-284.
Clinical trials -- a brave new partnership: a response to Mrs. Thornton.M. Baum - 1994 - Journal of Medical Ethics 20 (1):23-25.
Smokers, virgins, equity and health care costs.H. V. McLachlan - 1995 - Journal of Medical Ethics 21 (4):209-213.
A randomised controlled trial of ribavirin in Crimean Congo haemorrhagic fever: ethical considerations.B. Arda, A. Aciduman & J. C. Johnston - 2012 - Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (2):117-120.
Coping with obligations towards patient and society: an empirical study of attitudes and practice among Norwegian physicians.T. Arnesen & S. Fredriksen - 1995 - Journal of Medical Ethics 21 (3):158-161.
Randomisation and resource allocation: a missed opportunity for evaluating health care and social interventions.T. Toroyan - 2000 - Journal of Medical Ethics 26 (5):319-322.
Setting Priorities in the Spanish Health Care System.Q. Quintana & A. Infante - 1995 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20 (6):595-606.
Unaltered ethical standards for individual physicians in the face of drastically reduced resources resulting from an improvised nuclear device event.J. J. Caro, C. N. Coleman, A. Knebel & E. G. DeRenzo - 2011 - Journal of Clinical Ethics 22 (1):33-41.
Medical decision making in scarcity situations.J. J. M. van Delden - 2004 - Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (2):207-211.
Conflict in the Pediatric Setting: Clinical Judgment vs. Parental Autonomy.Amnon Goldworth - 1995 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 4 (1):36.
Analytics
Added to PP
2015-05-04
Downloads
30 (#533,027)
6 months
6 (#520,934)
2015-05-04
Downloads
30 (#533,027)
6 months
6 (#520,934)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Empirical and philosophical analysis of physicians' judgements of medical indications.Joar Björk, Niels Lynöe & Niklas Juth - 2016 - Clinical Ethics 11 (4):190-199.
Individual responsibility as ground for priority setting in shared decision-making.Lars Sandman, Erik Gustavsson & Christian Munthe - 2016 - Journal of Medical Ethics 42 (10):653-658.
Is healthcare providers’ value-neutrality depending on how controversial a medical intervention is? Analysis of 10 more or less controversial interventions.Niels Lynöe, Joar Björk & Niklas Juth - 2017 - Clinical Ethics 12 (3):117-123.
How stable are moral judgements? A longitudinal study of context dependency in attitudes towards patient responsibility.Berit H. Bringedal & Karin Isaksson Rø - 2024 - BMC Medical Ethics 25 (1):1-9.
References found in this work
Principles of biomedical ethics.Tom L. Beauchamp - 1989 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by James F. Childress.
Principles of Biomedical Ethics.Ezekiel J. Emanuel, Tom L. Beauchamp & James F. Childress - 1995 - Hastings Center Report 25 (4):37.
Responsibility in health care: a liberal egalitarian approach.A. W. Cappelen & O. F. Norheim - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (8):476-480.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-64dd777598-cl5t5 uwo