46 found
Order:
  1.  35
    Health, Luck, and Justice.Shlomi Segall - 2009 - Princeton University Press.
    Health, Luck, and Justice is the first attempt to systematically apply luck egalitarianism to the just distribution of health and health care.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   102 citations  
  2.  6
    Why Inequality Matters: Luck Egalitarianism, its Meaning and Value.Shlomi Segall - 2016 - Cambridge University Press.
    Equality is a key concept in our moral and political vocabulary. There is wide agreement on its instrumental value and its favourable impact on many aspects of society, but less certainty over whether it has a non-instrumental or intrinsic value that can be demonstrated. In this project, Shlomi Segall explores and defends the view that it does. He argues that the value of equality is not reducible to a concern we might have for the worse off, or to ensuring that (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  3.  34
    Equality and Opportunity.Shlomi Segall - 2013 - Oxford University Press.
    Egalitarians have traditionally been suspicious of equality of opportunity, but recently there has been a sea-change in thinking about that concept. Shlomi Segall brings together these developments and offers a new account of 'radical equality of opportunity', which removes all obstacles (to one's opportunity-set) that lie outside one's control.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations  
  4.  65
    What is the Point of Sufficiency?Shlomi Segall - 2016 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 33 (1):36-52.
    Telic sufficientarians hold that there is something special about a certain threshold level such that benefiting people below it, or raising them above it, makes an outcome better in at least one respect. The article investigates what fundamental value might ground that view. The aim is to demonstrate that sufficientarianism, at least on this telic version, is groundless and as such indefensible. The argument is advanced in three steps: first, it is shown that sufficientarianism cannot be grounded in a personal (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  5. In Solidarity with the Imprudent: A Defense of Luck Egalitarianism.Shlomi Segall - 2007 - Social Theory and Practice 33 (2):177-198.
  6. What's so Bad About Discrimination?Shlomi Segall - 2012 - Utilitas 24 (1):82-100.
    The article argues that discrimination is bad as such when and because it undermines equality of opportunity. It shows, first, that other accounts, such as those concerning intent, efficiency, false representation, prejudice, respect and desert cannot account for the badness of discrimination as such. The inequality of opportunity account, in contrast, captures everything that is bad about discrimination. The article then addresses some counter-examples of practices that are discriminatory without arguably entailing inequality of opportunity, where the notable case is that (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  7.  58
    Is Health Care (Still) Special?Shlomi Segall - 2007 - Journal of Political Philosophy 15 (3):342–361.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   29 citations  
  8. Why Egalitarians Should Not Care About Equality.Shlomi Segall - 2012 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (4):507 - 519.
    Can outcome equality (say, in welfare) ever be unjust? Despite the extensive inquiry into the nature of luck egalitarianism in recent years, this question is curiously under-explored. Leading luck egalitarians pay little attention to the issue of unjust equalities, and when they do, they appear not to speak in one voice. To facilitate the inquiry into the potential injustice of equalities, the paper introduces two rival interpretations of egalitarianism: the responsibility view, which may condemn equalities as unjust (when they reflect (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  9.  12
    In Solidarity with the Imprudent: A Defense of Luck Egalitarianism.Shlomi Segall - 2007 - Social Theory and Practice 33 (2):177-198.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   28 citations  
  10. Is Health (Really) Special? Health Policy Between Rawlsian and Luck Egalitarian Justice.Shlomi Segall - 2010 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 27 (4):344-358.
    In recent work, Norman Daniels extends the application of Rawls's principle of ‘fair equality of opportunity’ from health care to health proper. Crucial to that account is the view that health care, and now also health, is special. Daniels also claims that a rival theory of distributive justice, namely luck egalitarianism (or ‘equal opportunity for welfare’), cannot provide an adequate account of justice in health and health care. He argues that the application of that theory to health policy would result (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  11. Making Fair Choices on the Path to Universal Health Coverage.Ole Frithjof Norheim, Trygve Ottersen, Bona Chitah, Richard Cookson, Norman Daniels, Nir Eyal, Walter Flores, Axel Gosseries, Daniel Hausman, Samia Hurst, Lydia Kapiriri, Toby Ord, Shlomi Segall, Frehiwot Defaye, Alex Voorhoeve & Alicia Yamin - 2014 - World Health Organisation.
    This report by the WHO Consultative Group on Equity and Universal Health Coverage addresses how countries can make fair progress towards the goal of universal coverage. It explains the relevant tradeoffs between different desirable ends and offers guidance on how to make these tradeoffs.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  12.  43
    In Defense of Priority.Shlomi Segall - 2015 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 14 (4):343-364.
    In a recent article, Michael Otsuka and Alex Voorhoeve argue that prioritarianism fails to account for the shift in moral significance in gains to individuals in interpersonal as compared to intrapersonal cases. In this article, I show that the priority view escapes this objection but in a way that deprives it of its anti-egalitarian stance. Despite Otsuka and Voorhoeve, prioritarianism, rightly understood, provides consistent and attractive recommendations in both single- and multi-person cases. Yet prioritarians, the article goes on to show, (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  13.  81
    Unconditional Welfare Benefits and the Principle of Reciprocity.Shlomi Segall - 2005 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 4 (3):331-354.
    Stuart White and others claim that providing welfare benefits to citizens who do not, and are not willing to, work breaches the principle of reciprocity. This, they argue, justifies placing a minimum work requirement on welfare recipients. This article seeks to rebut their claim. It begins by rejecting the attempt to ground the work requirement on a civic obligation to work. The article then explores the principle of reciprocity, and argues that the practice of reciprocity depends on the particular conception (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  14. Should the Best Qualified Be Appointed?Shlomi Segall - 2012 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 9 (1):31-54.
    The paper examines the view that individuals have a claim to the jobs for which they are the best qualified. It seeks to show this view to be groundless, and to offer, instead, a luck egalitarian account of justice in hiring. That account consists of three components: monism, non-meritocracy, and non-discrimination. To demonstrate the coherence of this view, two particular internal conflicts are addressed. First, luck egalitarian monism (the view that jobs are not special) may end up violating the non-discrimination (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  15.  58
    What’s So Egalitarian About Luck Egalitarianism?Shlomi Segall - 2015 - Ratio 28 (3):349-368.
    Luck egalitarians typically hold that it is bad for some to be worse off than others through no fault or choice of their own. In this paper I want to address two complaints against standard luck egalitarianism that do not question responsibility-sensitivity. The first objection says that equality itself lacks inherent non-instrumental value, and so the luckist component ought to be attached to a different pattern, say prioritarianism. The second objection also endorses luckism but worries that luck egalitarianism as conventionally (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  16.  35
    Sufficientarianism and the Separateness of Persons.Shlomi Segall - 2019 - Philosophical Quarterly 69 (274):142-155.
    Utilitarians are said to be indifferent between interpersonal and intrapersonal transfers. In doing so, they fail to register the separateness of persons. This ‘separateness of persons’ objection has been traditionally used against utilitarianism, but more recently against prioritarianism. In this paper, I examine how yet another distributive view, namely sufficientarianism, fares in this respect. Sufficientarians famously believe that while inequality as such does not matter, what does matter is that all individuals meet some adequate threshold. It is often taken for (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  17.  10
    The Old Man’s Bundle, Still: Kristi Olson Revisits the Envy Test.Shlomi Segall - 2021 - Analysis 81 (2):378-385.
    Individuals come into the world with talents that differ greatly in their marketability. These talents command a wide variety of rents; from millions of dollars per film for a movie star, to just a few thousands of dollars per annum for a fast-food joint worker. How should we distribute income fairly given these disparities? That is the topic of Kristi Olson’s excellent new book, The Solidarity Solution: Principles for a Fair Income Distribution. 1 1 The question is not new, but (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  18.  57
    If You’Re a Luck Egalitarian, How Come You Read Bedtime Stories to Your Children?Shlomi Segall - 2011 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 14 (1):23-40.
  19.  67
    Incas and Aliens: The Truth in Telic Egalitarianism.Shlomi Segall - 2016 - Economics and Philosophy 32 (1):1-19.
  20.  3
    Index.Shlomi Segall - 2009 - In Health, Luck, and Justice. Princeton University Press. pp. 235-239.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  21.  17
    Why We Should Be Negative About Positive Egalitarianism.Shlomi Segall - 2019 - Utilitas 31 (4):414-430.
    The article assesses recent attempts to deflect two persistent objections to Positive Egalitarianism, the view that equality adds to the goodness of a state of affairs. The first says that PE entails bringing into existence individuals who are equal to each other in leading horrible lives, such that they are worth not living. I assess three strategies for deflecting this objection: offering a restricted version of PE; biting the bullet; and pressing a levelling out counter-objection. The second objection points out (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  22. Symposium & Debate.David Alvarez, Axel Gosseries, Martin Marchman Andersen, Lasse Nielsen, David V. Axelsen, Daniel Weinstock & Shlomi Segall - 2012 - Ethical Perspectives 19 (2):277-334.
  23. Cómo tomar decisiones justas en el camino hacia la cobertura universal de salud.Ole Frithjof Norheim, Trygve Ottersen, Bona Chitah, Richard Cookson, Norman Daniels, Frehiwot Defaye, Nir Eyal, Walter Flores, Axel Gosseries, Daniel Hausman, Samia Hurst, Lydia Kapiriri, Toby Ord, Shlomi Segall, Gita Sen, Alex Voorhoeve, Tessa T. T. Edejer, Andreas Reis, Ritu Sadana, Carla Saenz, Alicia Yamin & Daniel Wikler - 2015 - Pan-American Health Organization (PAHO).
    La cobertura universal de salud está en el centro de la acción actual para fortalecer los sistemas de salud y mejorar el nivel y la distribución de la salud y los servicios de salud. Este documento es el informe fi nal del Grupo Consultivo de la OMS sobre la Equidad y Cobertura Universal de Salud. Aquí se abordan los temas clave de la justicia (fairness) y la equidad que surgen en el camino hacia la cobertura universal de salud. Por lo (...)
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  24.  6
    7. Luck Egalitarian Justice in Health.Shlomi Segall - 2009 - In Health, Luck, and Justice. Princeton University Press. pp. 98-110.
  25. Luck Prioritarian Justice in Health.Shlomi Segall - 2011 - In Carl Knight & Zofia Stemplowska (eds.), Responsibility and Distributive Justice. Oxford University Press.
  26.  99
    Review of Martha C. Nussbaum, Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership (Cambridge, Ma: Harvard University Press, 2006), Pp. XIII + 487. [REVIEW]Shlomi Segall - 2009 - Utilitas 21 (4):526-529.
  27. Faire Des Choix Justes Pour Une Couverture Sanitaire Universelle.Ole Frithjof Norheim, Trygve Ottersen, Bona Chitah, Richard Cookson, Norman Daniels, Frehiwot Defaye, Nir Eyal, Walter Flores, Axel Gosseries, Daniel Hausman, Samia Hurst, Lydia Kapiriri, Toby Ord, Shlomi Segall, Gita Sen, Alex Voorhoeve, Daniel Wikler, Alicia Yamin, Tessa T. T. Edejer, Andreas Reis, Ritu Sadana & Carla Saenz - 2015 - World Health Organization.
    This report from the WHO Consultative Group on Equity and Universal Health Coverage offers advice on how to make progress fairly towards universal health coverage.
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  28. 8.1 The Concept of Agent Responsibility.Shlomi Segall, Hillel Steiner, Zofia Stemplowska, Andrew Williams & Jo Wolff - 2011 - In Carl Knight & Zofia Stemplowska (eds.), Responsibility and Distributive Justice. Oxford University Press.
  29.  14
    ‘Bringing the Middle Classes Back In’ An Egalitarian Case for (Truly) Universal Public Services.Shlomi Segall - unknown
    Some egalitarians argue against public services that are free for all, on the grounds that free access appears to primarily benefit the middle classes. I advocate, instead, the inclusion of the middle classes in public services, arguing that only truly universal intake of public services prevents the inegalitarian effects of economic segregation. Such universal participation in public services is achieved, partly, through subsidies for, and regulation of, privately produced services.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  30.  26
    How Devolution Upsets Distributive Justice.Shlomi Segall - 2007 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 4 (2):257-272.
    Philippe Van Parijs suggests that in culturally divided societies health care systems (and perhaps other welfare services) should be divided along regional lines. He argues that since members of homogenous societies have relatively similar needs and tastes, it is easier for them to agree on a rather comprehensive distributive scheme. This proposed reform of health care, Van Parijs argues, would be consistent with distributive justice rather than undermine it. Against Van Parijs, the paper demonstrates that this policy of devolution upsets (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  31.  7
    9. Distributing Human Enhancements.Shlomi Segall - 2009 - In Health, Luck, and Justice. Princeton University Press. pp. 121-136.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  32.  7
    8. Equality or Priority in Health?Shlomi Segall - 2009 - In Health, Luck, and Justice. Princeton University Press. pp. 111-120.
  33.  6
    11. Global Justice and National Responsibility for Health.Shlomi Segall - 2009 - In Health, Luck, and Justice. Princeton University Press. pp. 153-170.
  34.  5
    Contents.Shlomi Segall - 2009 - In Health, Luck, and Justice. Princeton University Press.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  35.  5
    10. Devolution of Health Care Services.Shlomi Segall - 2009 - In Health, Luck, and Justice. Princeton University Press. pp. 139-152.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  36.  4
    Conclusion.Shlomi Segall - 2009 - In Health, Luck, and Justice. Princeton University Press. pp. 171-174.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  37.  4
    2. Responsibility- Insensitive Health Care.Shlomi Segall - 2009 - In Health, Luck, and Justice. Princeton University Press. pp. 29-44.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  38.  4
    6. Why Justice in Health?Shlomi Segall - 2009 - In Health, Luck, and Justice. Princeton University Press. pp. 89-97.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  39.  3
    Introduction.Shlomi Segall - 2009 - In Health, Luck, and Justice. Princeton University Press. pp. 1-8.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  40.  3
    Notes.Shlomi Segall - 2009 - In Health, Luck, and Justice. Princeton University Press. pp. 175-220.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  41.  3
    Preface.Shlomi Segall - 2009 - In Health, Luck, and Justice. Princeton University Press.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  42.  3
    5. Responsibility- Sensitive Universal Health Care.Shlomi Segall - 2009 - In Health, Luck, and Justice. Princeton University Press. pp. 74-86.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  43.  3
    4. Tough Luck? Why Luck Egalitarians Need Not Abandon Reckless Patients.Shlomi Segall - 2009 - In Health, Luck, and Justice. Princeton University Press. pp. 58-73.
  44.  3
    3. Ultra- Responsibility- Sensitive Health Care: “All- Luck Egalitarianism”.Shlomi Segall - 2009 - In Health, Luck, and Justice. Princeton University Press. pp. 45-57.
  45.  2
    Bibliography.Shlomi Segall - 2009 - In Health, Luck, and Justice. Princeton University Press. pp. 221-234.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  46.  2
    1. Justice, Luck, and Equality.Shlomi Segall - 2009 - In Health, Luck, and Justice. Princeton University Press. pp. 9-26.