Speak No Evil: Understanding Hermeneutical (In)justice

Episteme 19 (3):431-454 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Miranda Fricker's original presentation of Hermeneutical Injustice left open theoretical choice points leading to criticisms and subsequent clarifications with the resulting dialectic appearing largely verbal. The absence of perspicuous exposition of hallmarks of Hermeneutical Injustice might suggest scenarios exhibiting some – but not all – such hallmarks are within its purview when they are not. The lack of clear hallmarks of Hermeneutical Injustice, moreover, obscures both the extent to which Fricker's proposed remedy Hermeneutical Justice – roughly, virtuous communicative practices – adequately addresses the injustice, and the accuracy of criticisms suggesting that Hermeneutical Justice is insufficient to the task. In what follows, after briefly defending necessary and sufficient conditions for what I take to be the best candidate interpretation of Hermeneutical Injustice, I build on recent work on moral responsibility to construct and defend a rigorous explication of Hermeneutical Justice.

Similar books and articles

A Critique of Hermeneutical Injustice.Laura Beeby - 2011 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 111 (3pt3):479-486.
Epistemic Injustice and Illness.Ian James Kidd & Havi Carel - 2016 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 34 (2):172-190.
Two Kinds of Unknowing.Rebecca Mason - 2011 - Hypatia 26 (2):294-307.


Added to PP

2,879 (#2,594)

6 months
1,036 (#989)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John Beverley
University at Buffalo

Citations of this work

Whose Hermeneutical Marginalization?Nick Clanchy - 2023 - Episteme 20 (3):813-832.
Hermeneutical injustice: an exercise in conceptual precision.Blas Radi - 2022 - Estudios de Filosofía (Universidad de Antioquia) 66:97-100.
Counternarrative Themes.John Beverley & Regina Hurley - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (2):72-74.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations