Contentious Problems in Bioscience and Biotechnology: A Pilot Study of an Approach to Ethics Education
Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (2):653-668 (2013)
Abstract
This manuscript describes a pilot study in ethics education employing a problem-based learning approach to the study of novel, complex, ethically fraught, unavoidably public, and unavoidably divisive policy problems, called “fractious problems,” in bioscience and biotechnology. Diverse graduate and professional students from four US institutions and disciplines spanning science, engineering, humanities, social science, law, and medicine analyzed fractious problems employing “navigational skills” tailored to the distinctive features of these problems. The students presented their results to policymakers, stakeholders, experts, and members of the public. This approach may provide a model for educating future bioscientists and bioengineers so that they can meaningfully contribute to the social understanding and resolution of challenging policy problems generated by their workAuthor's Profile
DOI
10.1007/s11948-012-9359-6
My notes
Similar books and articles
Teaching ethics to scientists and engineers: Moral agents and moral problems.Caroline Whitbeck - 1995 - Science and Engineering Ethics 1 (3):299-308.
A Systematic Approach to Engineering Ethics Education.Jessica Li & Shengli Fu - 2012 - Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (2):339-349.
Ethicalization in Bioscience—A Pilot Study in Finland.Matti Häyry, Jukka Takala, Piia Jallinoja, Salla Lötjönen & Tuija Takala - 2006 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 15 (3):282-284.
Environmental ethics beyond principle? The case for a pragmatic contextualism.Ben A. Minteer, Elizabeth A. Corley & Robert E. Manning - 2004 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 17 (2):131-156.
Teaching Health Law: Problem-Based Learning Regarding “Fractious Problems” in Health Law: Reflections on an Educational Experiment.Roberta M. Berry - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (4):694-703.
Nussbaum's capabilities approach and nonhuman animals: Theory and public policy.Ramona Ilea - 2008 - Journal of Social Philosophy 39 (4):547-563.
A virtue-centered approach to the biotechnology commons (or, the virtuous penguin).David W. Opderbeck - manuscript
Why Norton's approach is insufficient for environmental ethics.Laura Westra - 2009 - In Ben A. Minteer (ed.), Environmental Ethics. Temple University Press. pp. 279-297.
A psychological model that integrates ethics in engineering education.Susan Magun-Jackson - 2004 - Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (2):219-224.
“Mind the gaps”: An empirical approach to engineering ethics, 1997–2001. [REVIEW]Robert E. McGinn - 2003 - Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (4):517-542.
Analytics
Added to PP
2012-03-05
Downloads
44 (#267,313)
6 months
3 (#224,280)
2012-03-05
Downloads
44 (#267,313)
6 months
3 (#224,280)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
A Systematic Literature Review of US Engineering Ethics Interventions.Justin L. Hess & Grant Fore - 2018 - Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (2):551-583.
A Meta-analytic Comparison of Face-to-Face and Online Delivery in Ethics Instruction: The Case for a Hybrid Approach.E. Michelle Todd, Logan L. Watts, Tyler J. Mulhearn, Brett S. Torrence, Megan R. Turner, Shane Connelly & Michael D. Mumford - 2017 - Science and Engineering Ethics 23 (6):1719-1754.
Review of Instructional Approaches in Ethics Education. [REVIEW]Tyler J. Mulhearn, Logan M. Steele, Logan L. Watts, Kelsey E. Medeiros, Michael D. Mumford & Shane Connelly - 2017 - Science and Engineering Ethics 23 (3):883-912.
Understanding Ill-Structured Engineering Ethics Problems Through a Collaborative Learning and Argument Visualization Approach.Michael Hoffmann & Jason Borenstein - 2014 - Science and Engineering Ethics 20 (1):261-276.
Reflexive Principlism as an Effective Approach for Developing Ethical Reasoning in Engineering.Jonathan Beever & Andrew O. Brightman - 2016 - Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (1):275-291.
References found in this work
The Engineering and Science Issues Test (ESIT): A Discipline-Specific Approach to Assessing Moral Judgment. [REVIEW]Jason Borenstein, Matthew J. Drake, Robert Kirkman & Julie L. Swann - 2010 - Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (2):387-407.
The absent professor: Why we don't teach research ethics and what to do about it.Arri Eisen & Roberta M. Berry - 2002 - American Journal of Bioethics 2 (4):38 – 49.
The engineering and science issues test : A discipline-specific approach to assessing moral judgment.Matthew Jason Borenstein, Robert Kirkman J. Drake & L. Swann Julie - 2010 - Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (2):387-407.
A Systematic Approach to Engineering Ethics Education.Jessica Li & Shengli Fu - 2012 - Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (2):339-349.