Why Norton's approach is insufficient for environmental ethics

In Ben Minteer (ed.), Nature in Common?: Environmental Ethics and the Contested Foundations of Environmental Policy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press. pp. 279-297 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

There has been an ongoing debate about the best approach in environmental ethics. Bryan Norton believes that “weak anthropocentrism” will yield the best results for public policy, and that it is the most defensible position. In contrast, I have argued that an ecocentric, holistic position is required to deal with the urgent environmental problems that face us, and that position is complemented by the ecosystem approach and complex systems theory. I have called this approach “the ethics of integrity,” and in this paper I show why this perspective suggests better solutions to difficult cases, for which “weak anthropocentrism” fails to provide an answer

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,853

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Intrinsic Value for Pragmatists?Ben A. Minteer - 2001 - Environmental Ethics 23 (1):57-75.
Environmental ethics and weak anthropocentrism.Bryan G. Norton - 1984 - Environmental Ethics 6 (2):131-148.
Examining Ecosystem Integrity.Bruce Morito - 1999 - Environmental Ethics 21 (1):59-73.
Clearing the Way for a Life-Centered Ethic for Business.Bryan G. Norton - 2000 - The Ruffin Series of the Society for Business Ethics 2:159-165.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-07-20

Downloads
59 (#271,933)

6 months
12 (#213,237)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?