Doxastic Affirmative Action

Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 27 (2):203-220 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

According to the relational egalitarian theory of justice, justice requires that people relate as equals. To relate as equals, many relational egalitarians argue, people must (i) regard each other as equals, and (ii) treat each other as equals. In this paper, we argue that, under conditions of background injustice, such relational egalitarians should endorse affirmative action in the ways in which (dis)esteem is attributed to people as part of the regard-requirement for relating as equals.

Similar books and articles

What Relational Egalitarians Should (Not) Believe.Andreas Bengtson & Lauritz Aastrup Munch - 2024 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 27 (2).
Relational Justice: Egalitarian and Sufficientarian.Andreas Bengtson & Lasse Nielsen - 2023 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 40 (5):900-918.
Why Be a Relational Egalitarian?Xuanpu Zhuang - 2024 - Philosophical Forum 55 (1):3-26.
Relational Egalitarianism, Institutionalism, and Workplace Hierarchy.Brian Berkey - 2023 - In Julian David Jonker & Grant J. Rozeboom (eds.), Working as Equals: Relational Egalitarianism and the Workplace. New York, US: Oxford University Press USA. pp. 194-213.
Republicanism and/or Relational Egalitarianism?Andreas Bengtson - 2022 - Social Theory and Practice 48 (4):629-645.
Wrongful Discrimination Without Equal, Basic Moral Status.Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen - 2022 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 26 (1):19-36.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-07-31

Downloads
273 (#76,870)

6 months
118 (#42,505)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Andreas Bengtson
Aarhus University
Lauritz Munch
Aarhus University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations