Intelligence, race, and psychological testing

In Naomi Zack (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Race (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This chapter has two main goals: to update philosophers on the state of the art in the scientific psychology of intelligence, and to explain and evaluate challenges to the measurement invariance of intelligence tests. First, we provide a brief history of the scientific psychology of intelligence. Next, we discuss the metaphysics of intelligence in light of scientific studies in psychology and neuroimaging. Finally, we turn to recent skeptical developments related to measurement invariance. These have largely focused on attributability: Where do the mechanisms and dispositions that explain people’s performance on tests of intelligence inhere – in the agent, in the local testing environment, in the culture, or in the interactions among these? After explaining what measurement invariance is in the context of intelligence testing, we explore the phenomenon of stereotype threat as a challenge to measurement invariance, as well as more recent work on overcoming or buffering against stereotype threat.



External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Are jews smarter than everyone else?Sander L. Gilman - 2008 - Mens Sana Monographs 6 (1):41.
The Psychological Methods of Testing Intelligence. [REVIEW]Kate Gordon - 1916 - Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 13 (5):137-137.
Race and Iq.Ashley Montagu (ed.) - 1999 - Oxford University Press USA.
Sociobiology and psychometrics: Do they really need each other?John Rust - 1988 - Philosophical Psychology 1 (1):117 – 129.
On the artificiality of artificial intelligence.Hans F. M. Crombag - 1993 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 2 (1):39-49.
A series of form boards.George Oscar Ferguson - 1920 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 3 (1):47.
Précis of Bias in Mental Testing.Arthur R. Jensen - 1980 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (3):325-333.
A Philosopher's Reaction to Intelligence Tests.W. Mays - 1954 - Philosophy 29 (110):231 - 243.


Added to PP

970 (#8,617)

6 months
64 (#25,684)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mark Alfano
Macquarie University

Citations of this work

g as bridge model.Devin Sanchez Curry - 2021 - Philosophy of Science 88 (5):1067-1078.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The inference to the best explanation.Gilbert H. Harman - 1965 - Philosophical Review 74 (1):88-95.
Virtue Epistemology.John Turri, Mark Alfano & John Greco - 1999 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy:1-51.
How heritability misleads about race.Ned Block - 1996 - In Bernard Boxill (ed.), Boston Review. Oxford University Press. pp. 99-128.

View all 10 references / Add more references