Methodology and Scientific Competition

Episteme 8 (2):165-183 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Why is the average quality of research in open science so high? The answer seems obvious. Science is highly competitive, and publishing high quality research is the way to rise to the top. Thus, researchers face strong incentives to produce high quality work. However, this is only part of the answer. High quality in science, after all, is what researchers in the relevant field consider to be high quality. Why and how do competing researchers coordinate on common quality standards? I argue that, on the methodological level, science is a dynamic beauty contest.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,264

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Can designing and selling low-quality products be ethical?Willem Bakker & Michael C. Loui - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (2):153-170.
The status of business ethics: Past and future. [REVIEW]Richard T. George - 1987 - Journal of Business Ethics 6 (3):201 - 211.
Good genes, mating effort, and delinquency.Martin L. Lalumière & Vernon L. Quinsey - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):608-609.
The concept of quality in clinical research.Dorota Śwituła - 2006 - Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (1):147-156.
A critique of Kitcher on eugenic reasoning.Gregory Radick - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 32 (4):741-751.


Added to PP

80 (#153,785)

6 months
1 (#449,844)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Science, institutions, and values.C. Mantzavinos - 2021 - European Journal of Philosophy 29 (2):379-392.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Traktat über rationale Praxis.Hans Albert - 1982 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 44 (2):376-377.

Add more references