Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. A historical/epistemological account of the foundation of the key ideas supporting chemical equilibrium theory.Juan Quílez - 2018 - Foundations of Chemistry 21 (2):221-252.
    In this paper it is performed a historical account of the theoretical roots that grounded the following four key basic ideas of chemical equilibrium: ‘incomplete reaction’, ‘reversibility’, ‘equilibrium constant’ and ‘molecular dynamics’. These notions developed in nineteenth-century as a consequence of the evolution of the concept of chemical affinity. The discussion begins with the presentation of the earliest affinity table [‘Table des rapports’] published in 1718 by Geoffroy. Afterwards, it is examined Bergman’s compilation. The theory supporting this arrangement assumed that (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • From Chemical Forces to Chemical Rates: A Historical/Philosophical Foundation for the Teaching of Chemical Equilibrium.Juan Quílez - 2009 - Science & Education 18 (9):1203-1251.
  • S. T. Coleridge: A poet's view of science.Trevor Levere - 1978 - Annals of Science 35 (1):33-44.
    This paper is concerned with Coleridge's view of science as at once a branch of knowledge and a creative activity, mediating between man and nature, and thereby complementing poetry. Coleridge was well-informed about contemporary science. He stressed the symbolic status of scientific language, the role of scientific genius, and the need in science to rely upon reason rather than the unqualified senses. Kepler and, more recently, John Hunter and Humphry Davy provided his favorite instances of scientific genius, while chemistry—Davy's not (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Romanticism, Natural Philosophy, and the Sciences: A Review and Bibliographic Essay.Trevor H. Levere - 1996 - Perspectives on Science 4 (4):463-488.
  • Julius Thomsen and classical thermochemistry.Helge Kragh - 1984 - British Journal for the History of Science 17 (3):255-272.
    Classical thermochemistry is inextricably bound up with the problem of chemical affinity. In 1851, when Julius Thomsen began his career in thermochemistry, the concept of chemical affinity had been in the centre of chemical enquiry for more than a century. In spite of many suggestions, preferably to explain affinity in terms of electrical or gravitational forces, almost nothing was known about the cause and nature of affinity. In this state of puzzling uncertainty some chemists felt it more advantageous to establish (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Speculation in Physics: The theory and practice of "Naturphilosophie".Barry Gower - 1973 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 3 (4):301.
  • Reception and discovery: the nature of Johann Wilhelm Ritter’s invisible rays.Jan Frercks, Heiko Weber & Gerhard Wiesenfeldt - 2009 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 40 (2):143-156.
    Ultraviolet radiation is generally considered to have been discovered by Johann Wilhelm Ritter in 1801. In this article, we study the reception of Ritter’s experiment during the first decade after the event—Ritter’s remaining lifetime. Drawing on the attributional model of discovery, we are interested in whether the German physicists and chemists granted Ritter’s observation the status of a discovery and, if so, of what. Two things are remarkable concerning the early reception, and both have to do more with neglect than (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Thermochemistry versus thermodynamics: The nineteenth century controversy.R. G. A. Dolby - 1984 - History of Science 22 (4):375-400.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Physics and Naturphilosophie: A Reconnaissance.Kenneth L. Caneva - 1997 - History of Science 35 (1):35-106.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations