Switch to: References

Citations of:

Comments on Professor Görgemanns' Paper

In William W. Fortenbaugh (ed.), On Stoic and Peripatetic Ethics: The Work of Arius Didymus. Transaction Publishers. pp. 190--199 (1983)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Conflict and Cosmopolitanism in Plato and the Stoics.Owen Goldin - 2011 - Apeiron 44 (3):264-286.
  • The Moral Development in Stoic Oikeiôsis and Wang Yang-Ming’s ‘Wan Wu Yi Ti’.Jiangxia Yu - 2017 - Asian Philosophy 27 (2):150-173.
    The Neo-Confucian notion of wan wu yi ti 万物一体 and Stoic oikeiôsis both come up with a motivational basis for the expansion of concern, but one of the toughest problems in them is how to elaborate on selfhood and self–other relation in moral development. This paper takes a comparative view of Hierocles’ fragments and a few other relevant Stoic texts and Wang Yang-ming’s Inquiry on the Great Learning, and argues that doing so helps eliminate some confusions concerning selfhood and self–other (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Nature and Utopia in Epictetus’ Theory of Oikeiōsis.Sara Magrin - 2018 - Phronesis 63 (3):293-350.
    _ Source: _Volume 63, Issue 3, pp 293 - 350 It is widely agreed that there is a gap between the personal and the social ethics of the Stoics due to the difficulty of harmonizing personal and social _oikeiōsis_. By reconstructing Epictetus’ theory of _oikeiōsis_, this paper aims to show that, in his ethics, there is no such gap, and this for two reasons: first, his account of social _oikeiōsis_ is not meant to ground his social ethics; second, his theory (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation