Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Scientific Biography, Cognitive Deficits, and Laboratory Practice: James McKeen Cattell and Early American Experimental Psychology, 1880–1904.Michael M. Sokal - 2010 - Isis 101 (3):531-554.
    ABSTRACT Despite widespread interest in individual life histories, few biographies of scientists make use of insights derived from psychology, another discipline that studies people, their thoughts, and their actions. This essay argues that recent theoretical work in psychology and tools developed for clinical psychological practice can help biographical historians of science create and present fuller portraits of their subjects' characters and temperaments and more nuanced analyses of how these traits helped shape their subjects' scientific work. To illustrate this thesis, the (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Baldwin, Cattell and the Psychological Review: a collaboration and its discontents.Michael M. Sokal - 1997 - History of the Human Sciences 10 (1):57-89.
    This paper provides a detailed account of the origins of the Psycho logical Review in 1894, of the policies and practices of its editors (James Mark Baldwin and James McKeen Cattell) during its first decade, and of the public and private disagreements that led them to dissolve their collaboration in 1904. In doing so, it sheds light on the significant roles played by specialized scientific journals in the development of specific scientific specialities, and illustrates the value for historical exploration of (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Mind and knowledge in the early thought of Franz Boas, 1887–1904.Valentina Mann - 2022 - History of the Human Sciences 35 (5):157-184.
    Franz Boas’ articulation of a new historicist and relativistic framework for anthropology stands as the founding moment of the discipline. Accordingly, scholars have sought to trace its source and inspirations, often concluding that Boas’ thought was shaped almost exclusively by his German background and characterized by a foundational methodological tension. Here, I instead show that Boas’ most creative early work benefitted from close interaction with debates in psychology and that his methodological reflections were part of the much wider series of (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark