8 found
Order:
  1.  13
    Nothing ‘Mere’ to It: Reclaiming Subjective Accounts of Normativity of Law.S. Swaminathan - 2019 - Journal of Human Values 25 (1):1-14.
    If the bindingness of morality was to rest on something as ‘subjective’ as the non-cognitivist says it does, the grouse goes, and morality itself would come down crashing. Nothing less than an ‘objective’ source of normativity, it is supposed, could hold morality in orbit. Some of these worries automatically morph into worries about the projectivist model of normativity of law as well: one which understands the authority or normativity of law in terms of subjective attitudes taken towards the law. As (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  2.  30
    Current Emotion Research in Music Psychology.Swathi Swaminathan & E. Glenn Schellenberg - 2015 - Emotion Review 7 (2):189-197.
    Music is universal at least partly because it expresses emotion and regulates affect. Associations between music and emotion have been examined regularly by music psychologists. Here, we review recent findings in three areas: the communication and perception of emotion in music, the emotional consequences of music listening, and predictors of music preferences.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  3.  42
    Projectivism and the Metaethical Foundations of the Normativity of Law.Shivprasad Swaminathan - 2016 - Jurisprudence 7 (2):231-266.
    A successful account of the ‘normativity of law’ is meant to inter alia establish how legal requirements come to be morally binding. This question presupposes taking a stance on the metaethical debate about the nature of morality and moral bindingness between the cognitivist and non-cognitivist camps. An overwhelming majority of contemporary legal philosophers have an unspoken adherence to a cognitivist metaethic and the model of normativity of law emerging from it: the impinging model. Consequently, the problematic of the normativity of (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  4.  14
    Reflection in Interaction.Renate Fruchter, Subashri Swaminathan, Manjunath Boraiah & Chhavi Upadhyay - 2007 - AI and Society 22 (2):211-226.
    A decision delay can translate into significant financial and business losses. One way to accelerate the decision process is through improved communication among the stakeholders engaged in the project. Capturing, transferring, managing, and reusing data, information, and knowledge in the context it is generated can lead to higher productivity, effective communication, reduced number of requests for clarification, and a shorter time-to-market cycle. We formalized the concept of reflection in interaction during communicative events among multiple project stakeholders. This concept extends Donald (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  5. Moore’s Paradox and Normative Detachment.Shivprasad Swaminathan - forthcoming - Journal of Human Values:097168582210934.
    Journal of Human Values, Ahead of Print. It is paradoxical to make a moral statement and, in the same breath, disavow commitment to it. Following G. E. Moore, who first identified an analogous paradox—albeit, in the case of factual statements and disavowal of belief in them—these are called Moore paradoxical statements. Richard Hare argues that in order to determine whether an ‘ought’ is a moral one, one only needs to examine if this attitudinal adherence necessarily accompanies the judgement in question. (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6. Moore’s Paradox and Normative Detachment.Shivprasad Swaminathan - forthcoming - Sage Publications India: Journal of Human Values.
    Journal of Human Values, Ahead of Print. It is paradoxical to make a moral statement and, in the same breath, disavow commitment to it. Following G. E. Moore, who first identified an analogous paradox—albeit, in the case of factual statements and disavowal of belief in them—these are called Moore paradoxical statements. Richard Hare argues that in order to determine whether an ‘ought’ is a moral one, one only needs to examine if this attitudinal adherence necessarily accompanies the judgement in question. (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7.  5
    What the Centipede Knows: Polycentricity and ‘Theory’ for Common Lawyers.Shivprasad Swaminathan - 2020 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 40 (2):265-290.
    For Michael Polanyi, ‘polycentricity’ was a method of decision making—of which he saw the common law as a prime exemplar—where numerous decision makers mutually adjust their decisions to their expectations of what will pass muster with the community of decision makers, without the use of any common blueprint. This article argues that Polanyi’s idea of polycentricity—once disentangled from Lon Fuller’s borrowed, but unrelated, use of the term—has the potential to illuminate much for the legal theorist. First, from several elements in (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8. Effect of HIV on Pharmacokinetics of Antituberculosis Drugs.Geetha Ramachandran, A. K. Hemanth Kumar, Prema Gurumurthy, S. Rajasekaran, C. Padmapriyadarshini, S. Bhagavathy, P. Venkatesan, L. Sekar & Soumya Swaminathan - 2005 - Contagion: Journal of Violence, Mimesis, and Culture 2 (2):182-183.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark