Results for ' stimulus'

1000+ found
Order:
See also
  1.  81
    Stimulus, response, meaning.Jonathan Bennett - unknown
  2. Stimulus-control based upon shock escapability.Pj Bersh, Sl Sabulsky, Troisi Jr & Je Blustein - 1986 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 24 (5):348-348.
  3. From stimulus to science.Willard Van Orman Quine - 1997 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
    For the faithful there is much to ponder. In this short book, based on lectures delivered in Spain in 1990, Quine begins by locating his work historically.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   143 citations  
  4.  27
    Stimulus information and contextual information as determinants of tachistoscopic recognition of words.Endel Tulving & Cecille Gold - 1963 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 66 (4):319.
  5.  26
    Stimulus intensity and reaction time: Evaluation of a decision-theory model.Harry G. Murray - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 84 (3):383.
  6.  23
    From Stimulus to Science.W. V. Quine - 1995 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
    W. V. Quine is one of the most eminent philosophers alive today. Now in his mid-eighties he has produced a sharp, sprightly book that encapsulates the whole of his philosophical enterprise, including his thinking on all the key components of his epistemological stance--especially the value of logic and mathematics. New readers of Quine may have to go slowly, fathoming for themselves the richness that past readers already know lies between these elegant lines. For the faithful there is much to ponder. (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   57 citations  
  7.  56
    Stimulus information as a determinant of reaction time.Ray Hyman - 1953 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 45 (3):188.
  8.  21
    From Stimulus to Science.W. V. Quine, Paolo Leonardi & Marco Santambrogio - 1997 - Philosophical Quarterly 47 (189):519-523.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   107 citations  
  9. Unconscious, stimulus-dependent priming and conscious, percept-dependent priming with chromatic stimuli.Bruno G. Breitmeyer, Tony Ro, Haluk Ögmen & Steven Todd - 2007 - Perception and Psychophysics 69 (4):550-557.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  10.  26
    Stimulus spacing and the judgment of loudness.Joseph C. Stevens - 1958 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 56 (3):246.
  11.  53
    Stimulus and response generalization: Tests of a model relating generalization to distance in psychological space.Roger N. Shepard - 1958 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 55 (6):509.
  12.  26
    Stimulus pretraining and subsequent performance in the delayed reaction experiment.Charles C. Spiker - 1956 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 52 (2):107.
  13.  30
    Conditioned stimulus intensity and temporal factors in spaced-trial classical conditioning.Gerald W. Barnes - 1956 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 51 (3):192.
  14.  16
    Stimulus sequence and concept learning.Marvin H. Detambel & Lawrence M. Stolurow - 1956 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 51 (1):34.
  15.  48
    Stimulus-category competition, inhibition, and affective devaluation: a novel account of the uncanny valley.Anne E. Ferrey, Tyler J. Burleigh & Mark J. Fenske - 2015 - Frontiers in Psychology 6:92507.
    Stimuli that resemble humans, but are not perfectly human-like, are disliked compared to distinctly human and nonhuman stimuli. Accounts of this “Uncanny Valley” effect often focus on how changes in human resemblance can evoke different emotional responses. We present an alternate account based on the novel hypothesis that the Uncanny Valley is not directly related to ‘human-likeness’ per se, but instead reflects a more general form of stimulus devaluation that occurs when inhibition is triggered to resolve conflict between competing (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  16. Stimulus properties of conditioned taste-aversion odor.William Robert Batsell & Hw Ludvigson - 1989 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 27 (6):501-501.
  17. Stimulus set and response set: Two kinds of selective attention.D. E. Broadbent - 1970 - In D. Mostofsky (ed.), Attention: Contemporary Theory and Analysis. Appleton-Century-Crofts. pp. 51--60.
  18.  12
    Pre-stimulus Alpha Activity Modulates Face and Object Processing in the Intra-Parietal Sulcus, a MEG Study.Narjes Soltani Dehaghani, Burkhard Maess, Reza Khosrowabadi, Reza Lashgari, Sven Braeutigam & Mojtaba Zarei - 2022 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 16.
    Face perception is crucial in all social animals. Recent studies have shown that pre-stimulus oscillations of brain activity modulate the perceptual performance of face vs. non-face stimuli, specifically under challenging conditions. However, it is unclear if this effect also occurs during simple tasks, and if so in which brain regions. Here we used magnetoencephalography and a 1-back task in which participants decided if the two sequentially presented stimuli were the same or not in each trial. The aim of the (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  19. A stimulus-response analysis of anxiety and its role as a reinforcing agent.O. H. Mowrer - 1939 - Psychological Review 46 (6):553-565.
  20.  15
    Stimulus generalization as a function of verbal reinforcement combination.Arnold H. Buss, Morton Weiner & Edith Buss - 1954 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 48 (6):433.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  21.  33
    Stimulus generalization of a positive conditioned reinforcer: III. The new learning method.Salvatore C. Caronite & David R. Thomas - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 71 (3):385.
  22.  18
    Stimulus codability and long-term recognition memory for visual form.Terry C. Daniel & Henry C. Ellis - 1972 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 93 (1):83.
  23.  11
    Stimulus Parameters Underlying Sound‐Symbolic Mapping of Auditory Pseudowords to Visual Shapes.Simon Lacey, Yaseen Jamal, Sara M. List, K. Sathian & Lynne C. Nygaard - 2020 - Cognitive Science 44 (9):e12883.
    Sound symbolism refers to non‐arbitrary mappings between the sounds of words and their meanings and is often studied by pairing auditory pseudowords such as “maluma” and “takete” with rounded and pointed visual shapes, respectively. However, it is unclear what auditory properties of pseudowords contribute to their perception as rounded or pointed. Here, we compared perceptual ratings of the roundedness/pointedness of large sets of pseudowords and shapes to their acoustic and visual properties using a novel application of representational similarity analysis (RSA). (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  24.  12
    The Facial Expressive Action Stimulus Test. A test battery for the assessment of face memory, face and object perception, configuration processing, and facial expression recognition.Beatrice de Gelder, Elisabeth M. J. Huis in ‘T. Veld & Jan Van den Stock - 2015 - Frontiers in Psychology 6:162648.
    There are many ways to assess face perception skills. In this study, we describe a novel task battery FEAST (Facial Expression Action Stimulus Test) developed to test recognition of identity and expressions of human faces as well as stimulus control categories. The FEAST consists of a neutral and emotional face memory task, a face and object identity matching task, a face and house part-to-whole matching task, and a human and animal facial expression matching task. The identity and part-to-whole (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  25.  29
    Multidimensional stimulus differences and accuracy of discrimination.Charles W. Eriksen & Harold W. Hake - 1955 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 50 (3):153.
  26.  25
    Stimulus generalization of the conditioned eyelid response to structurally similar nonsense syllables.David W. Abbott & Louis E. Price - 1964 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 68 (4):368.
  27.  33
    Stimulus area, stimulus dispersion, flash duration, and the scotopic threshold.Oscar S. Adams, Davis J. Chambliss & Arthur J. Riopelle - 1955 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 49 (6):428.
  28.  26
    Stimulus categorizing in the generalization of a voluntary response.Eric Aronson & Albert Erlebacher - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 78 (4p1):585.
  29.  15
    Stimulus generalization along one and two dimensions in pigeons.Charles M. Butter - 1963 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 65 (4):339.
  30.  29
    Stimulus versus response decisions as determinants of the relative frequency effect in disjunctive reaction-time performance.P. John Dillon - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 71 (3):321.
  31.  18
    Stimulus coding of complex stimulus structures.Allen R. Dobbs - 1973 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 101 (1):164.
  32.  11
    Stimulus familiarization and changes in distribution of stimulus encodings.Allen R. Dobbs - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 102 (2):234.
  33.  13
    Stimulus control within response-correlated approach chains.John W. Donahoe & James H. McCroskery - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 80 (3p1):512.
  34. The poverty of the stimulus argument.Stephen Laurence & Eric Margolis - 2001 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52 (2):217-276.
    Noam Chomsky's Poverty of the Stimulus Argument is one of the most famous and controversial arguments in the study of language and the mind. Though widely endorsed by linguists, the argument has met with much resistance in philosophy. Unfortunately, philosophical critics have often failed to fully appreciate the power of the argument. In this paper, we provide a systematic presentation of the Poverty of the Stimulus Argument, clarifying its structure, content, and evidential base. We defend the argument against (...)
    Direct download (13 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   42 citations  
  35.  35
    Stimulus generalization in the learning of classifications.Roger N. Shepard & Jih-Jie Chang - 1963 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 65 (1):94.
  36.  23
    Stimulus discriminability and S-R compatibility: Evidence for independent effects in choice reaction time.Irving Biederman & Robert Kaplan - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 86 (3):434.
  37.  20
    Conditioned stimulus intensity and response speed.Raymond M. Bragiel & Charles C. Perkins Jr - 1954 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 47 (6):437.
  38.  19
    Multidimensional stimulus generalization of a tactile response along the dimensions of angularity and texture.Ronald B. Purtle & Frederick L. Newman - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 81 (3):566.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  39.  13
    Stimulus specificity: Nonreward.E. J. Capaldi - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 72 (3):410.
  40.  21
    Stimulus generalization as a function of level of experimentally induced anxiety.Gerald Rosenbaum - 1953 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 45 (1):35.
  41.  22
    Stimulus similarity and sequence of stimulus presentation in paired-associate learning.Ernst Z. Rothkopf - 1958 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 56 (2):114.
  42.  7
    Flawed stimulus design in additive-area heuristic studies.Joonkoo Park - 2022 - Cognition 229 (C):104919.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  43.  9
    Stimulus intensity, site of stimulation, and individual reactivity as determinants of the energy threshold for pricking pain.Donald J. Dillon - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 77 (4):559.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  44.  26
    The stimulus-reinforcer hypothesis of behavioral momentum: Some methodological considerations.Carlos F. Aparicio - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (1):90-91.
    This commentary focuses on the stimulus-reinforcer hypothesis of resistance to change. The overall context of reinforcement can account for resistance to extinction. There are ways to systematically test the hypothesis that Pavlovian contingencies account for the behavioral “mass” of discriminated operant behavior.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  45.  18
    On stimulus and response discriminability.Harry P. Bahrick & Merrill Noble - 1961 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 61 (6):449.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  46.  26
    Stimulus correlates for the judged illumination of a surface.Jacob Beck - 1959 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 58 (4):267.
  47.  15
    Stimulus learning and recognition in paired-associate learning.Harley A. Bernbach - 1967 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 75 (4):513.
  48.  15
    Some stimulus variables affecting solution shift performance.L. E. Bourne & Shirley Miller - 1973 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 98 (2):291.
  49.  19
    Stimulus-reinforcer predictiveness and selective discrimination learning in pigeons.Edward A. Wasserman - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 103 (2):284.
  50.  63
    Stimulus, sensation, and meaning.Glenn D. Higginson - 1935 - Journal of Philosophy 32 (24):645-650.
    We can find no place in psychology for the concept of stimulus as a physical agent to which an individual responds in a psychological manner. Moreover, we can find no place for sensation and image when considered as simple mental elements. We would also purge ...
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
1 — 50 / 1000