People with jumping to conclusions bias tend to make context-independent decisions rather than context-dependent decisions

&
Consciousness and Cognition 98 (C):103279 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1016/j.concog.2022.103279

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,897

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The psychology and rationality of decisions from experience.Ralph Hertwig - 2012 - Synthese 187 (1):269-292.
The Decision Makers: Ethics for Engineers.James H. Armstrong, John Ross Dixon & Simon Robinson - 1999 - Thomas Telford.
Jumping to Conclusions bias, BADE and Feedback Sensitivity in schizophrenia and schizotypy.V. Juárez-Ramos, J. Rubio, C. Delpero, G. Mioni & F. Stablum - 2014 - Consciousness and Cognition 26 (C):133-144.
Hopping, skipping or jumping to conclusions? Clarifying the role of the JTC bias in delusions.Cordelia Fine, Mark Gardner, Jillian Craigie & Ian Gold - 2007 - Cogn Neuropsychiatry 12 (1):46-77.
Reducing Ingroup Bias in Ethical Consumption: The Role of Construal Levels and Social Goodwill.Diego Costa Pinto, Adilson Borges, Márcia Maurer Herter & Mário Boto Ferreira - 2020 - Business Ethics Quarterly 30 (1):31-63.
Ethicists, doctors and triage decisions: who should decide? And on what basis?Silvia Camporesi & Maurizio Mori - 2021 - Journal of Medical Ethics 47 (12):e18-e18.
¿Porqué razonan los humanos?Hugo Mercier, Juan Manuel Vivas, Dan Sperber & Cecilia McDonnell - 2019 - Cuadernos Filosóficos / Segunda Época 15.
An investigation into the jumping-to-conclusions bias in social anxiety.Kristy M. Johnstone, Junwen Chen & Ryan P. Balzan - 2017 - Consciousness and Cognition 48:55-65.
Even better than the real thing: Alternative outcome bias affects decision judgements and decision regret.Catherine E. Seta, John J. Seta, John V. Petrocelli & Michael McCormick - 2015 - Thinking and Reasoning 21 (4):446-472.
Jumping to explanations versus jumping to conclusions.Ramón Pino-Pérez & Carlos Uzcátegui - 1999 - Artificial Intelligence 111 (1-2):131-169.
Do we make decisions for other people based on our predictions of their preferences? evidence from financial and medical scenarios involving risk.Eleonore Batteux, Eamonn Ferguson & Richard J. Tunney - 2019 - Thinking and Reasoning 26 (2):188-217.
Understanding perception of algorithmic decisions: Fairness, trust, and emotion in response to algorithmic management.Min Kyung Lee - 2018 - Big Data and Society 5 (1).
Establishing joint decisions in a dyad.Melisa Stevanovic - 2012 - Discourse Studies 14 (6):779-803.
An Evolutionary Perspective on Information Processing.Peter C. Trimmer & Alasdair I. Houston - 2014 - Topics in Cognitive Science 6 (2):312-330.
Context Dependence.Kent Bach - 2012 - In Manuel García-Carpintero & Max Kölbel (eds.), The Continuum Companion to the Philosophy of Language. Continuum International.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-04-08

Downloads
10 (#1,194,003)

6 months
6 (#520,798)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition Advancing the Debate.Jonathan Evans & Keith E. Stanovich - 2013 - Perspectives on Psychological Science 8 (3):223-241.
On the reality of cognitive illusions.Daniel Kahneman & Amos Tversky - 1996 - Psychological Review 103 (3):582-591.
Conservatism in a simple probability inference task.Lawrence D. Phillips & Ward Edwards - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 72 (3):346.

View all 11 references / Add more references