Ethical Obligations to Psychopaths are Not Dependent on Development or Abuse

American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 4 (2):31-33 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In “What We Owe the Psychopath: A Neuroethical Analysis,” Grant Gillett and Jiaochen Huang (2013) argue for a new ethical paradigm to address moral obligations to psychopaths. Focusing on the statu...

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,435

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Evolutionary Explanation of Psychopaths.Seungbae Park - 2013 - International Journal of Social Science Studies 1 (2):1-7.
Psychopathy and internalism.Victor Kumar - 2016 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 46 (3):318-345.
The moral bioenhancement of psychopaths.Elvio Baccarini & Luca Malatesti - 2017 - Journal of Medical Ethics 43 (10):697-701.
Corruption as violation of distributed ethical obligations.Ivar Kolstad - 2012 - Journal of Global Ethics 8 (2-3):239-250.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-06-22

Downloads
4 (#1,608,067)

6 months
2 (#1,221,975)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Practical Ethics.John Martin Fischer - 1983 - Philosophical Review 92 (2):264.
What We Owe the Psychopath: A Neuroethical Analysis.Grant Gillett & Jiaochen Huang - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 4 (2):3-9.

Add more references