Psychopathy and criminal responsibility

Neuroethics 1 (3):205-212 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article considers whether psychopaths should be held criminally responsible. After describing the positive law of criminal responsibility in general and as it applies to psychopaths, it suggests that psychopaths lack moral rationality and that severe psychopaths should be excused from crimes that violate the moral rights of others. Alternative forms of social control for dangerous psychopaths, such as involuntary civil commitment, are considered, and the potential legal implications of future scientific understanding of psychopathy are addressed.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Some Thoughts on Diverse Psychopathic Offenders and Legal Responsibility.Christopher Ciocchetti - 2003 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 10 (2):195-198.
Psychopathy and responsibility theory.Paul Litton - 2010 - Philosophy Compass 5 (8):676-688.
The mad, the bad, and the psychopath.Heidi L. Maibom - 2008 - Neuroethics 1 (3):167-184.
Diagnosing blame: Responsibility and the psychopath.Carl Elliott - 1992 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 17 (2):199-214.
Responsible psychopaths.Patricia S. Greenspan - 2003 - Philosophical Psychology 16 (3):417 – 429.
Moral unreason: The case of psychopathy.Heidi Lene Maibom - 2005 - Mind and Language 20 (2):237-57.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
540 (#31,945)

6 months
31 (#100,497)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Neither desert nor disease.Stephen J. Morse - 1999 - Legal Theory 5 (3):265-309.

Add more references