Corruption as violation of distributed ethical obligations

Journal of Global Ethics 8 (2-3):239-250 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The ethics of corruption cannot be analysed without simultaneously addressing the legitimacy of public office or entrusted power. This paper introduces a concept of core unethical corruption, defined as violations of distributed ethical obligations for private gain. In other words, it is suggested that what is ethically wrong with corruption is that it entails the violation of certain obligations attributed to agents. By explicitly relating corruption to obligations, this approach helps make ethical sense of the concepts of public office or entrusted power, attending to the question of their legitimacy. Since distributed obligations are implied by a wide range of ethical theories, the concept of core unethical corruption also reflects a (partial) overlapping consensus on the ethics of corruption

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Private-to-private corruption.Antonio Argandoña - 2003 - Journal of Business Ethics 47 (3):253 - 267.
Corruption in the Media.Edward H. Spence - 2008 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 22 (2):231-241.
Combating Corruption.Leo V. Ryan - 2000 - Business Ethics Quarterly 10 (1):331-338.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-09-11

Downloads
49 (#310,442)

6 months
18 (#127,601)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Political corruption.Emanuela Ceva & Maria Paola Ferretti - 2017 - Philosophy Compass 12 (12):e12461.
Political corruption as a relational injustice.Emanuela Ceva - 2018 - Social Philosophy and Policy 35 (2):118-137.
Agency law and odious debts.Cristian Dimitriu - 2017 - Ethics and Global Politics 10 (1):77-97.
Corruption.Seumas Miller - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Anarchy, State, and Utopia.Robert Nozick - 1974 - New York: Basic Books.
Anarchy, State, and Utopia.Robert Nozick - 1974 - Philosophy 52 (199):102-105.
Business Ethics: A Kantian Perspective.Norman E. Bowie - 1982 - New York, NY: Wiley-Blackwell.
Inequality Re-examined.David Archard & Amartya Sen - 1995 - Philosophical Quarterly 45 (181):553.

View all 10 references / Add more references