- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Modality and Counterfactuals: Understanding the Role and Context of Metaphysical Underpinnings for Harm, Benefit and Identity Claims Arising from Genome Editing and Genetic Modification
American Journal of Bioethics 22 (9):52-54 (2022)
Abstract
Deriving ethical conclusions from arguments that rely heavily on metaphysical foundations, as Parfit (1984) does in generating his Nonidentity Problem, is an approach fraught with problems. Sparrow...Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Reconceptualizing Identity and Ethics in the Context of Conception.Janet Malek - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (9):42-44.
Epigenetics, Harm, and Identity.Joona Räsänen & Anna Smajdor - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (9):40-42.
Reasons to Genome Edit and Metaphysical Essentialism about Human Identity.Tomasz Żuradzki & Vilius Dranseika - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (9):34-36.
Theoretical vs Practical Reasons: Derek Parfit and Bioethics.J. S. Blumenthal-Barby - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (9):1-3.
Parfit’s Non-Identity Problem.Hossein Khodadadi - 2024 - Journal of the Belarusian State University 1 (1):41-46.
Human Genome Editing and Identity: The Precariousness of Existence and the Abundance of Argumentative Options.Inmaculada de Melo-Martín - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (9):18-20.
Harm to Future Persons: Non-Identity Problems and Counterpart Solutions.Anthony Wrigley - 2012 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (2):175-190.
Human Germline Genome Editing: On the Nature of Our Reasons to Genome Edit.Robert Sparrow - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (9):4-15.
What Are the Wider Implications of Sparrow’s Benefit Argument?David Wasserman - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (9):28-30.
Genome Editing, Non-Identity and the Notion of Harm.Alina Omerbasic - 2018 - In Matthias Braun, Hannah Schickl & Peter Dabrock (eds.), Between Moral Hazard and Legal Uncertainty: Ethical, Legal and Societal Challenges of Human Genome Editing. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. pp. 67-81.
Analytics
Added to PP
2022-08-31
Downloads
34 (#457,310)
6 months
18 (#192,640)
2022-08-31
Downloads
34 (#457,310)
6 months
18 (#192,640)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
References found in this work
On the Plurality of Worlds.David Lewis - 1986 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 178 (3):388-390.
Why We Should Reject S.Derek Parfit - 1984 - In Reasons and Persons. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Human Germline Genome Editing: On the Nature of Our Reasons to Genome Edit.Robert Sparrow - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (9):4-15.
Mitochondrial Replacement: Ethics and Identity.Anthony Wrigley, Stephen Wilkinson & John B. Appleby - 2015 - Bioethics 29 (9):631-638.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-5pqs9 uwo