Human Genome Editing and Identity: The Precariousness of Existence and the Abundance of Argumentative Options

American Journal of Bioethics 22 (9):18-20 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In “Human germline genome editing: On the nature of our reasons to genome edit,” Robert Sparrow (2022) presents a central claim and a secondary one. The central claim is that, for the foreseeable f...

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/15265161.2022.2105437

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Human Genome Editing and Ethical Considerations.Kewal Krishan, Tanuj Kanchan & Bahadur Singh - 2016 - Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (2):597-599.
Altered Inheritance: CRISPR and the Ethics of Human Genome Editing.Carolyn P. Neuhaus - 2021 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 31 (4):27-39.
Untangling the Promises of Human Genome Editing.Katherine Drabiak - 2018 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 46 (4):991-1009.
Does human genome editing reinforce or violate human dignity?Seppe Segers & Heidi Mertes - 2019 - Bioethics 34 (1):33-40.
Playing it Safe? Precaution, Risk, and Responsibility in Human Genome Editing.Sarah Chan - 2020 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 63 (1):111-125.
Genome Editing, Non-Identity and the Notion of Harm.Alina Omerbasic - 2018 - In Matthias Braun, Hannah Schickl & Peter Dabrock (eds.), Between Moral Hazard and Legal Uncertainty: Ethical, Legal and Societal Challenges of Human Genome Editing. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. pp. 67-81.
Altered Inheritance: CRISPR and the Ethics of Human Genome Editing.Donna Dickenson - 2020 - The New Bioethics 26 (1):75-77.
L’uomo creatore di se stesso. La rivoluzione della genetica tra nuove possibilità e (in)evitabili rischi.Mauro Mandrioli - 2020 - Scienza E Filosofia 24:84–104.
Reproductive genome editing interventions are therapeutic, sometimes.César Palacios-González - 2021 - Bioethics 35 (6):557-562.
Public views on gene editing and its uses.Hub Zwart, George Gaskell & Imre Bard - 2017 - Nature Biotechnology 35 (11):121-123.
A Path Through the Morass.Giulia Cavaliere - 2018 - In Matthias Braun, Hannah Schickl & Peter Dabrock (eds.), Between Moral Hazard and Legal Uncertainty: Ethical, Legal and Societal Challenges of Human Genome Editing. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. pp. 203-225.
From genome editing to human genetic enhancement: a new time for discussing eugenics?Mauro Mandrioli - 2022 - Scienza E Filosofia 27:237-250.
The Nuffield Council’s green light for genome editing human embryos defies fundamental human rights law.Katherine Drabiak - 2020 - Bioethics 34 (3):223-227.
Genome Modifying Reproductive Procedures and their Effects on Numerical Identity.Calum MacKellar - 2019 - The New Bioethics 25 (2):121-136.
Why human germline genome editing is incompatible with equality in an inclusive society.Calum MacKellar - 2021 - The New Bioethics 27 (1):19-29.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-08-31

Downloads
21 (#723,160)

6 months
12 (#203,198)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Inmaculada de Melo-Martin
Weill Cornell Medicine--Cornell University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Gene editing, identity and benefit.Thomas Douglas & Katrien Devolder - 2022 - Philosophical Quarterly 72 (2):305-325.
Gene Editing, Identity and Benefit.Thomas Douglas & Katrien Devolder - 2022 - Philosophical Quarterly 72 (2):305-325.
A Not‐So‐New Eugenics.Robert Sparrow - 2011 - Hastings Center Report 41 (1):32-42.

View all 6 references / Add more references