Theoria 73 (3):221-239 (2007)

Authors
Michael J. Wreen
Marquette University
Abstract
One form of argument from analogy is identified and Stephen Barker's remarks about a second kind of argument from analogy, non-inductive (and non-deductive) argument from analogy, are used as a springboard to identify a second form. That form is then refined, explained, exemplified, and related to the first form. It is argued that there is a spectrum of different forms of argument from analogy, with the two forms identified being end points on the spectrum. Except in terms of form, however, there is no reason to speak of two different kinds of argument from analogy.
Keywords Argument from analogy
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1755-2567.2007.tb01201.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,163
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Paradox of Analogy.David Botting - 2012 - Informal Logic 32 (1):98-115.
The Cumulative Force of Analogies.David Botting - 2018 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 27 (1):105-141.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-09-13

Total views
117 ( #100,000 of 2,506,511 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,791 of 2,506,511 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes