American Philosophical Quarterly 14 (2):137-41 (1977)
AbstractIf the argument from analogy is an argument for other minds it must rely on a single case, The correlation of your mind with your body. If instead it only attempts to show that certain sorts of experiences are associated with other bodies, It can rely on innumerable correlations of your experiences with your behavior. Having determined in this way that ostensive memories are associated with another body and that they are the kind one would expect if one mind had been associated with this body throughout its existence, You can then offer another argument to this effect--And you could do so even if your own memories associated your own experiences with a succession of different bodies
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
No references found.
Citations of this work
Connection or Competition: Identity and Personhood in Feminist Ethics.Grace M. Jantzen - 1992 - Studies in Christian Ethics 5 (1):1-20.
A Multiple Case Inference and Other Minds.Alec Hyslop - 1979 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 57 (4):330-36.
Similar books and articles
Analogy: A Study of Qualification and Argument in Theology.Humphrey Palmer - 1973 - Macmillan.
Just What is Wrong with the Argument From Analogy?Don Locke - 1973 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 51 (2):153-56.
Strawson and the Argument for Other Minds.D. L. C. Maclachlan - 1993 - Journal of Philosophical Research 18:149-157.
Abortion, Analogies and the Emergence of Value.Paul F. Camenisch - 1976 - Journal of Religious Ethics 4 (1):131 - 158.
TIDAC: Identity, Analogy, and Logical Argument in Science.Allen MacNeill - 2009 - The Evolution List.