Argumentation 19 (1):1-27 (2005)
AbstractABSTRACT: In this essay I characterize arguments by analogy, which have an impor- tant role both in philosophical and everyday reasoning. Arguments by analogy are dif- ferent from ordinary inductive or deductive arguments and have their own distinct features. I try to characterize the structure and function of these arguments. It is further discussed that some arguments, which are not explicit arguments by analogy, nevertheless should be interpreted as such and not as inductive or deductive arguments. The result is that a presumed outcome of a philosophical dispute will have to be reconsidered.
Similar books and articles
By Parallel Reasoning: The Construction and Evaluation of Analogical Arguments.Paul Bartha - 2009 - Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
TIDAC: Identity, Analogy, and Logical Argument in Science.Allen MacNeill - 2009 - The Evolution List.
Argument by Analogy in Thales and Anaximenes.Giannis Stamatellos - 2011 - In Michael Bruce & Steven Barbone (eds.), Just the Arguments: 100 of the Most Important Arguments in Western Philosophy. Wiley-Blackwell.
Analogy Counterarguments: A Taxonomy for Critical Thinking. [REVIEW]Cameron Shelley - 2004 - Argumentation 18 (2):223-238.
A Problem with Alston's Indirect Analogy-Argument From Religious Experience.Ulf Zackariasson - 2006 - Religious Studies 42 (3):329-341.
Induction: Representation, Strategy and Argument.David W. Green - 1994 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 8 (1):45 – 50.
Perceptual Disanalogy: On the Alstonian Analogy Argument From Religious Experience.William Coleman Williams - unknown
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Organisms ≠ Machines.Daniel J. Nicholson - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 44 (4):669-678.
The Logical and Pragmatic Structure of Arguments From Analogy.Fabrizio Macagno - 2017 - Logique Et Analyse 240:465-490.
Analogical Arguments: Inferential Structures and Defeasibility Conditions.Fabrizio Macagno, Douglas Walton & Christopher Tindale - 2017 - Argumentation 31 (2):221-243.
Argument From Analogy in Law, the Classical Tradition, and Recent Theories.Fabrizio Macagno & Douglas Walton - 2009 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 42 (2):154-182.
Classifying the Patterns of Natural Arguments.Fabrizio Macagno & Douglas Walton - 2015 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 48 (1): 26-53.