Taking a Step Back: The Ethical Significance of DTC Neurotechnology

American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 10 (4):170-172 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Contractualism and the Significance of Perspective-Taking.Peter Timmerman - 2015 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 18 (5):909-925.
Assertion: Just One Way to Take It Back.Mona3 Simion - 2016 - Logos and Episteme 7 (3):385-391.
Ethical Issues Surrounding Direct-to-Consumer Advertising of Neurotechnology.Donna Hanrahan - 2012 - Ethics in Biology, Engineering and Medicine 3 (1-3):173-184.
Guest Editorial: Neuroethics—From Neurotechnology to Healthcare.Judy Illes & Eric Racine - 2007 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 16 (2):125-128.
A Three-Person Model of Empathy.Fritz Breithaupt - 2012 - Emotion Review 4 (1):84-91.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-10-24

Downloads
14 (#968,362)

6 months
4 (#800,606)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Verina Wild
Ludwig Maximilians Universität, München

References found in this work

Dimensions of Ethical Direct-to-Consumer Neurotechnologies.Karola V. Kreitmair - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 10 (4):152-166.

Add more references