Asian Philosophy 13 (1):3 – 13 (2003)

In her well-known In A Different Voice, Gilligan argues that the male and female approaches to morality are fundamentally opposed to each other. The masculine approach emphasizes impartial justice, and the application of a 'hierarchy' of rules. In contrast, the feminine approach is grounded in care and concern for others, and emphasizes flexibility and attention to context when making moral decisions. This paper offers a critique of Gilligan's views through a consideration of Mencian morality. Mencius inhabits the 'feminine' perspective insofar as his morality is grounded in care and responsibility. However, he develops from this a philosophy of government which recognizes the need for impartial justice to apply among citizens. Mencius's views show that, pace Gilligan, there is no inherent incompatibility between 'feminine' care and concern and 'male' impartial justice. It is possible for the latter to be founded upon the former.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/09552360301663
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,172
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Confucianism and Human Rights.Wm Theodore de Bary & Tu Weiming (eds.) - 1998 - Columbia University Press.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
35 ( #327,220 of 2,517,824 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #272,606 of 2,517,824 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes