Eine auch sich selbst missverstehende kritik: Über Das reflexionsdefizit formaler explikationen [Book Review]

Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 27 (2):347 - 352 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A Criticism misjudging itself too. On the Deficiency of Reflection in Formal Explications. The criticism formulated by L. B. Puntel concerning the theory of dialectic proposed by the author is rejected. Puntel's attempt at explicating predication by means of (second order) predicate logic fails: It misjudges predication being already presupposed for the possibility of predicate logic, thus belonging to the transcendental conditions of formal predicate logic, so that predication itself cannot be further explicated by means of such logic. What is in fact criticized by Puntel is something like an artefact of formalization. The unreflected application of formal logic here generates problems instead of solving them

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
24 (#639,942)

6 months
5 (#629,136)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Dieter Wandschneider
Rwth Aachen University, Germany

Citations of this work

Dialektik und formalisierung.Lorenz B. Puntel - 1997 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 28 (2):367-383.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references