Ambiguity and Zeugma

Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 99 (4):749-762 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In arguing against a supposed ambiguity, philosophers often rely on the zeugma test. In an application of the zeugma test, a supposedly ambiguous expression is placed in a sentence in which several of its supposed meanings are forced together. If the resulting sentence sounds zeugmatic, that is taken as evidence for ambiguity; if it does not sound zeugmatic, that is taken as evidence against ambiguity. The aim of this article is to show that arguments based on the second direction of the test are misguided: ambiguous expressions, and in particular philosophically contested ones, do not reliably lead to zeugmaticity, so an absence of zeugmaticity provides no meaningful evidence for an absence of ambiguity.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ambiguity in Architecture.Christoph Baumberger - 2009 - In G. Ernst, O. Scholz & J. Steinbrenner (eds.), Nelson Goodman: From Logic to Art. Ontos. pp. 293--319.
Jaffray’s ideas on ambiguity.Peter P. Wakker - 2011 - Theory and Decision 71 (1):11-22.
An ambiguity test for definite descriptions.Adam Sennet - 2002 - Philosophical Studies 111 (1):81-95.
A linguistic grounding for a polysemy theory of ‘knows’.Mark Satta - 2018 - Philosophical Studies 175 (5):1163-1182.
On religious ambiguity.Robert Mckim - 2008 - Religious Studies 44 (4):373-392.
Two Types of Semantic Ambiguity.Laurie Jeanne Shrage - 1983 - Dissertation, University of California, San Diego
Religious Ambiguity in Hick’s Religious Pluralism.Amir Dastmalchian - 2009 - International Journal of Hekmat 1:75-89.
A generalization of Specker's theorem on typical ambiguity.Richard Kaye - 1991 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 56 (2):458-466.
Ambiguity in argument.Jan Albert van Laar - 2010 - Argument and Computation 1 (2):125-146.
Restoring ambiguity to Achinstein's account of evidence.Steven Gimbel - 2004 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55 (2):269-285.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-07-05

Downloads
50 (#319,955)

6 months
16 (#160,768)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Emanuel Viebahn
Freie Universität Berlin

Citations of this work

Ambiguity.Adam Sennet - 2011 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Rational supererogation and epistemic permissivism.Robert Weston Siscoe - 2021 - Philosophical Studies 179 (2):571-591.
Descriptions and Tests for Polysemy.Andrei Moldovan - 2021 - Axiomathes 31 (3):229-249.

View all 16 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The Concept of Mind.Gilbert Ryle - 1949 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 141:125-126.
Speaker’s Reference and Semantic Reference.Saul Kripke - 1977 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 2 (1):255-276.
Speaker's reference and semantic reference.Saul A. Kripke - 1977 - In Peter A. French, Theodore Edward Uehling & Howard K. Wettstein (eds.), Studies in the philosophy of language. Morris: University of Minnesota, Morris. pp. 255-296.
Knowing (How).Jason Stanley - 2011 - Noûs 45 (2):207-238.
Sameness and Substance Renewed.David Wiggins - 2001 - Philosophy 79 (307):133-141.

View all 26 references / Add more references