An ambiguity test for definite descriptions

Philosophical Studies 111 (1):81-95 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Donnellan makes a convincing case for two distinct uses ofdefinite descriptions. But does the difference between the usesreflects an ambiguity in the semantics of descriptions? This paperapplies a linguistic test for ambiguity to argue that the differencebetween the uses is not semantically significant

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

2004

DOI

10.1023/a:1021213311787

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Sharvy's theory of definite descriptions revisited.Berit Brogaard - 2007 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 88 (2):160–180.
Ambiguity, generality, and indeterminacy: Tests and definitions. [REVIEW]Brendan S. Gillon - 1990 - Synthese 85 (3):391 - 416.
Reference and definite descriptions.Keith S. Donnellan - 1966 - Philosophical Review 75 (3):281-304.
Descriptions: Points of Reference.Kent Bach - 2004 - In Marga Reimer & Anne Bezuidenhout (eds.), Descriptions and Beyond. Clarendon Press. pp. 189-229.
Co-extensive theories and unembedded definite descriptions.Alex Barber - 2005 - In Reinaldo Elugardo & Robert J. Stainton (eds.), Ellipsis and Nonsentential Speech. Springer. pp. 185–201.
The ambiguity of definite descriptions.Michael Mckinsey - 1979 - Theoria 45 (2):78-89.
Embedded definite descriptions: Russellian analysis and semantic puzzles.ST Kuhn - 2000 - Mind 109 (435):443-454.
Desires, Scope, and Tense.Delia Graff - 2003 - Philosophical Perspectives 17 (1):141-163.
Ambiguous Articles: An Essay On The Theory Of Descriptions.Francesco Pupa - 2008 - Dissertation, The Graduate Center, Cuny
The Ambiguity Thesis vs. Kripke's Defence of Russell: Further Developments.Murali Ramachandran & Nadja Rosental - 2000 - Philosophical Writings 14:49-57.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
112 (#154,927)

6 months
12 (#200,125)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Adam Sennet
University of California, Davis

Citations of this work

Ambiguity and Zeugma.Emanuel Viebahn - 2018 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 99 (4):749-762.
Rational supererogation and epistemic permissivism.Robert Weston Siscoe - 2021 - Philosophical Studies 179 (2):571-591.
Descriptions and Tests for Polysemy.Andrei Moldovan - 2021 - Axiomathes 31 (3):229-249.
Descriptions.Peter Ludlow - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Real and ideal rationality.Robert Weston Siscoe - 2021 - Philosophical Studies 179 (3):879-910.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Reference and definite descriptions.Keith S. Donnellan - 1966 - Philosophical Review 75 (3):281-304.
Descriptions.S. Neale - 1996 - Critica 28 (83):97-129.
The case for referential descriptions.Michael Devitt - 2004 - In Marga Reimer & Anne Bezuidenhout (eds.), Descriptions and Beyond. Oxford University Press. pp. 234--260.
On Testing for Conversational Implicature.Jerrold M. Sadock - 1978 - In Cole Peter (ed.), Syntax and Semantics: Pragmatics. Academic Press. pp. 281–297.

View all 7 references / Add more references