Conflict as the Quasi-Transcendental: Or, Why Spinoza’s Theologcal Political Treatise Matters for Transindividuality

Australasian Philosophical Review 2 (1):107-112 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Vardoulakis explores what Balibar means by designating transindividuality as ‘quasi-transcendental.’ He does so by turning to Balibar’s readings of Part IV of Spinoza’s Ethics, the Part that is central to Balibar’s understanding of the transindividual in Spinoza. Vardoulakis shows that the quasi-transcendental in Spinoza can only be a form of agonistic relations if his political theory in the Theological Political Treatise is to account for political change.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-12-19

Downloads
342 (#62,049)

6 months
97 (#52,351)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Dimitris Vardoulakis
University of Western Sydney, Hawkesbury

Citations of this work

Transindividuality in Dispute: A Response to my Readers.Étienne Balibar - 2018 - Australasian Philosophical Review 2 (1):113-117.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Philosophies of the Transindividual: Spinoza, Marx, Freud.Étienne Balibar - 2018 - Australasian Philosophical Review 2 (1):5-25.
Why Is Spinoza an Epicurean?Dimitris Vardoulakis - 2020 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 24 (2):389-409.

Add more references