Authors
Christopher Davidson
Ball State University
Abstract
This response focuses on Balibar’s method of thinking transindividuality through multiple figures, in their similarities as well as their productive differences. His essay ‘Philosophies of the Transindividual: Spinoza, Marx, Freud’ combines the three titular figures in order to better think the multifaceted idea of ‘classical’ transindividuality. Balibar’s method combines the three but nonetheless maintains their dissimilarities as real differences. This response attempts to test or apply that method in two ways. The first application links Balibar’s analysis of Freud’s hypnotic leader with a theme Balibar does not here discuss: wonder’s connection to superstition in Spinoza. At the level of their effects, superstitious wonder and hypnosis are nearly identical transindividual processes which lead to affective mass formation. However, their causes are quite distinct. This response details the similar effects and different causes, then asks the question: does their difference render them irreconcilable or complementary? Given the prominent role Spinoza plays in Balibar’s work, and the strong overall equivalence of wonder and hypnosis, this first application of Balibar’s method of multiple combination likely presents a complementarity rather than a conflict. This response’s second application, attempting to integrate another figure into the transindividual multiple, presents greater difficulties: what role, if any, could Foucault play in Balibar’s transindividuality? With Foucault, the tensions or differences perhaps amount to fundamental and thoroughgoing incompatibilities. However, combining Foucault with ‘classical’ transindividuality potentially extends and deepens each. This response concludes with examples of these problematic tensions as well as possibly fruitful combinations.
Keywords politics  mass psychology  Spinoza  Freud  Balibar  Foucault   affect  transindividuality
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1080/24740500.2018.1514970
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Philosophies of the Transindividual: Spinoza, Marx, Freud.Étienne Balibar - 2018 - Australasian Philosophical Review 2 (1):5-25.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Transindividuality in Dispute: A Response to My Readers.Étienne Balibar - 2018 - Australasian Philosophical Review 2 (1):113-117.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Immanence, Transindividuality and the Free Multitude.Daniela Voss - 2018 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 44 (8):865-887.
Philosophies of the Transindividual: Spinoza, Marx, Freud.Étienne Balibar - 2018 - Australasian Philosophical Review 2 (1):5-25.
Balibar and Transindividuality.Mark G. E. Kelly & Dimitris Vardoulakis - 2018 - Australasian Philosophical Review 2 (1):1-4.
Transindividuality in Dispute: A Response to My Readers.Étienne Balibar - 2018 - Australasian Philosophical Review 2 (1):113-117.
Hypnosis: Major Theoretical Orientations and Issues.Billie S. Strauss - 1986 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 6 (1):47-48.
Spinoza Et la Politique.Étienne Balibar - 1990 - Presses Universitaires de France - PUF.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-12-19

Total views
104 ( #106,956 of 2,463,136 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
23 ( #35,481 of 2,463,136 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes