Disparate Politics: Balibar and Simondon

Australasian Philosophical Review 2 (1):47-53 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

At the beginning of his essay ‘Philosophies of the Transindividual: Spinoza, Marx, Freud’, Balibar [2018] hints at some reasons why he will not be dealing with Simondon, despite agreeing with the latter’s program of going beyond ‘the metaphysics of the subject and of substance’ and towards an ‘ontology of relations’. In what follows I would like to outline Simondon’s concept of transindividuality and spell out more clearly why Balibar cannot follow Simondon’s trajectory. At the same time, I suggest a number of socio-political approaches that a specifically Simondonian concept of transindividuality opens up.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Saint Étienne.Martin McQuillan - 2017 - Philosophy Today 61 (4):877-890.
La disparation.Alberto Toscano - 2004 - Multitudes 4 (4):73-82.
Sept résonances de Simondon.Yves Citton - 2004 - Multitudes 4 (4):25-31.
Gilles Deleuze, a reader of Gilbert Simondon.Sean Bowden - 2012 - In Arne De Boever (ed.), Gilbert Simondon: being and technology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. pp. 135--153.
Simondon.Pascal Chabot - 2002 - Vrin.
Chute et élévation. L'apolitique de simondon.Bernard Stiegler - 2006 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 196 (3):325 - 341.
Penser le politique avec Simondon.Jacques Roux - 2004 - Multitudes 4 (4):47-54.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-12-19

Downloads
14 (#961,492)

6 months
5 (#652,053)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Daniela Voss
Deakin University

Citations of this work

Transindividuality in Dispute: A Response to my Readers.Étienne Balibar - 2018 - Australasian Philosophical Review 2 (1):113-117.

Add more citations