Talking About: A Response to Bowker, Keiser, Michaelson

Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I respond to comments from Mark Bowker, Jessica Keiser, and Eliot Michaelson on my book, Talking About. The response clarifies my stance on the nature of reference, conflicting intentions, and the sense in which language may have proper functions.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Metaphors and Martinis: a response to Jessica Keiser.Andreas Stokke - 2017 - Philosophical Studies 174 (4):853-859.
Keiser's Post-Critical Niebuhr.Charles S. McCoy - 1997 - Tradition and Discovery 24 (1):6-14.
Why we should keep talking about fake news.Jessica Pepp, Eliot Michaelson & Rachel Sterken - forthcoming - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 65 (4):471-487.
McCoy on Keiser's Niebuhr.R. Melvin Keiser - 1997 - Tradition and Discovery 24 (1):15-19.
Reflections from Geoffrey Bowker.Geoffrey C. Bowker - 2010 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 35 (5):579-580.
Mel as Hyperobject.Mel Keiser - 2018 - Performance Philosophy 4 (1):251-293.
Making moral decisions.Jean Holm & John Bowker (eds.) - 1994 - New York: Distributed exclusively in the U.S. and Canada by St. Martin's Press.
How to Count Animals, More or Less. [REVIEW]Eliot Michaelson - 2021 - Philosophical Review 130 (4):601-605.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-03-18

Downloads
188 (#103,574)

6 months
188 (#14,964)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Elmar Unnsteinsson
University College Dublin

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations