The frame thinking, i.e. the individual – but generalized – thought experiment supported by participant observation

Philosophical Discourses 3:21-39 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The essay presents an outline of the arguments for relativistic theses. Theses: about the theoretical incommensurability and undetermined translation interpreted in ethnic languages (Polish and Swahili). I justify the statement that the conceptual framework of individual languages – by analogy – to the analysed examples are mutually and fundamentally untranslatable. Untranslatable, at least concerning the fundamentally different cultural traditions characterizing the civilization of writing versus oral culture. I also indirectly justify the legitimacy of questioning the linear concept of development based on the involuntary acceptance in the humanities and social sciences of Euclidean geometry. Consequently, the article is part of a series of publications in which I argue for the need to reconstruct fundamental epistemological categories.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,829

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The evidential significance of thought experiment in science.W. J. - 1996 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 27 (2):233-250.
Participant Observation and Objectivity in Anthropology.Julie Zahle - 2013 - In Hanne Andersen, Dennis Dieks, Wenceslao González, Thomas Uebel & Gregory Wheeler (eds.), New Challenges to Philosophy of Science. Springer Verlag. pp. 365--376.
Thought Experiments.Rachel Cooper - 2005 - Metaphilosophy 36 (3):328-347.
Thought Experiment, Definition and Literary Fiction.McComb Geordie - 2013 - In Mélanie Frappier James R. Brown (ed.), Thought Experiments in Philosophy, Science, and the Arts. New York, NY, USA: pp. 207-222.
Why Thought Experiments are Not Arguments.Michael A. Bishop - 1999 - Philosophy of Science 66 (4):534-541.
Two Ways of Imagining Galileo's Experiment.Margot Strohminger - 2021 - In Christopher Badura & Amy Kind (eds.), Epistemic Uses of Imagination. Routledge. pp. 202-217.
Buridan’s Ass.Sharon M. Kaye - 2005 - Dialogue and Universalism 15 (3-4):137-146.
The Worst Thought Experiment.John D. Norton - 2018 - In Michael T. Stuart, Yiftach Fehige & James Robert Brown (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Thought Experiments. London: Routledge.
Zum Verhältnis zwischen Experiment und Gedankenexperiment in den Naturwissenschaften.Marco Buzzoni - 2007 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 38 (2):219-237.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-01-12

Downloads
5 (#1,539,211)

6 months
3 (#973,855)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Grzegorz Trela
Pedagogical University of Krakow

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references