Normative and Empirical Business Ethics: Separation, Marriage of Convenience, or Marriage of Necessity?

Business Ethics Quarterly 4 (2):129-143 (1994)

Abstract

This paper outlines three conceptions of the relationship between normative and empirical business ethics, views we refer to as parallel, symbiotic, and integrative. Parallelism rejects efforts to link normative and empirical inquiry, for both conceptual and practical reasons. The symbiotic position supports a practical relationship in which normative and/or empirical business ethics rely on each other for guidance in setting agenda or in applying the results of their conceptually and methodologically distinct inquiries. Theoretical integration countenances a deeper merging of prima facie distinct forms of inquiry, involving alterations or combinations of theory, metatheoretical assumptions, and methodology. This paper explicates these positions, summarizes arguments for and against each, and considers their implications for the future of business ethics research

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,856

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
53 (#218,223)

6 months
1 (#386,040)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Similar books and articles

Empirical Ethics, Context-Sensitivity, and Contextualism.Albert Musschenga - 2005 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (5):467 – 490.
Business ETHICS/BUSINESS Ethics: One Field or Two?Gary R. Weaver - 1994 - Business Ethics Quarterly 4 (2):113-128.
The Limits and Prospects of Business Ethics.George G. Brenkert - 2010 - Business Ethics Quarterly 20 (4):703-709.
Explanation and Justification.Joseph DesJardins - 2004 - The Ruffin Series of the Society for Business Ethics 2004:239-261.